This Act prohibits the exclusion of any individual from District of Columbia juries based on their sexual orientation, gender identity, or related sex characteristics.
Eleanor Norton
Representative
DC
The District of Columbia Local Juror Non-Discrimination Act of 2025 prohibits the exclusion of any person from serving on a jury in the District of Columbia based on their sexual orientation or gender identity. This legislation amends D.C. law to explicitly define "sex" for jury service purposes to include sexual orientation, gender identity, and related characteristics. The Act ensures that jury selection is based solely on citizenship, reinforcing protections against identity-based discrimination in the judicial process.
The “District of Columbia Local Juror Non-Discrimination Act of 2025” is a clear, targeted update to D.C.’s jury service rules. Essentially, this legislation makes it explicitly illegal to exclude a potential juror from service in D.C. courts just because of their sexual orientation or gender identity. It’s about ensuring that the jury box looks like the city it serves, and that the right to participate in the justice system is truly universal.
This bill achieves its goal by doing some serious legal housekeeping, specifically by broadening the definition of “sex” within the D.C. Code’s jury service procedures (Sec. 2). When the law talks about a person’s “sex” in this context, it now officially includes gender identity, sexual orientation, and gender stereotypes. It also covers pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions, as well as sex characteristics like intersex traits. This isn’t just adding a few words; it’s a comprehensive update designed to close any potential loopholes that might allow for identity-based discrimination during jury selection.
For most people, jury duty is an inconvenience, but it’s also a fundamental civic duty. This bill ensures that LGBTQ+ residents, including those who are transgender, non-binary, or intersex, cannot be dismissed during voir dire (the jury selection process) based on who they are or who they love. Think about it: if you’re a software engineer, a construction worker, or a teacher in D.C., your identity is now explicitly protected when you get that summons. This provision also extends protection to people based on who they associate with—meaning you can’t be excluded because of the sex or identity of your partner or friend.
The legislation also tackles the issue of perception (Sec. 2). It states that the definition of “sex” even covers how someone perceives you, even if that perception about your sex is factually incorrect. This is a smart move, recognizing that discrimination often stems from assumptions, not facts. By making this definition consistent across relevant D.C. jury procedures, the bill ensures that the anti-discrimination protections are clear and enforceable, reinforcing existing legal remedies without overriding them. This clarity is good for the courts, good for the community, and ultimately, good for the fairness of the trials themselves.