This act prohibits members of Congress, their spouses, and dependents from short selling stocks and other covered financial instruments.
Thomas Kean
Representative
NJ-7
The No Shorting America Act prohibits Members of Congress, their spouses, and dependents from engaging in short sales of publicly traded securities. This legislation aims to prevent insider trading risks by banning these "covered individuals" from betting against the stock market. Violators face the inability to deduct resulting losses for tax purposes and potential civil penalties up to $50,000. Compliance requires public certification through congressional ethics offices.
The “No Shorting America Act” is a piece of legislation aimed squarely at cleaning up the appearance—and reality—of conflicts of interest on Capitol Hill. In short, this bill bans Members of Congress, their spouses, and their dependents from engaging in a “short sale” of any financial instrument listed on a national exchange. A short sale is essentially a bet that a stock’s price is going to drop. This is about preventing lawmakers from profiting by betting against the companies or markets they are responsible for regulating.
This isn’t just about the Congressperson themselves. The bill explicitly defines “covered individuals” to include the Member, their spouse, and any dependent. That means the financial activities of an entire family unit are now under scrutiny. The ban covers a broad range of investments, called “Covered Financial Instruments,” which includes standard stocks and securities, but also complex tools like derivatives, options, and warrants tied to those securities. If you’re related to a lawmaker, your ability to manage your portfolio just got seriously restricted, even if your trading is totally legitimate and unrelated to your relative’s work.
When you break the rules, the consequences hit your wallet in two major ways. First, there’s a tax penalty: if a covered individual makes a prohibited short sale and loses money on the trade, they are not allowed to deduct that loss from their income taxes. Normally, investment losses are deductible, but here, the law removes that standard protection as a punitive measure. You lose the money, and you still pay taxes as if you didn't, making it a double whammy.
Second, the bill introduces a civil fine. If the supervising ethics office has “good reason to believe” a covered individual “willfully ignored” the ban, they must refer the case to the Attorney General. If a federal court finds the person knowingly and willfully violated the rule, they can be hit with a civil penalty of up to $50,000. Crucially, the bill makes sure this fine can’t be paid using taxpayer money, like the Member’s official office allowance, or campaign funds. This ensures the penalty is felt personally.
The bill requires Members of Congress to officially promise their ethics office that they will comply with these new rules. Once the ethics office confirms compliance, they issue a certificate. The key transparency feature here is that these compliance certificates must be posted on a public website. This means the public gets a clear, easy-to-access record showing that their elected officials and their families are following the financial rules. It’s a mechanism designed to build public trust by making the compliance process visible, not hidden behind closed doors.