PolicyBrief
H.R. 3935
119th CongressJun 11th 2025
Reducing Permitting Uncertainty Act
IN COMMITTEE

This Act establishes a time limit on the EPA Administrator's ability to restrict waste disposal areas under the Clean Water Act, tying the restriction period to the duration of the permit application process.

Pete Stauber
R

Pete Stauber

Representative

MN-8

LEGISLATION

Permitting Bill Puts EPA on the Clock: Restrictions on Waste Disposal Land Now Expire When Permits are Issued

The “Reducing Permitting Uncertainty Act” takes direct aim at the timeline for environmental reviews, specifically targeting how the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) handles land restrictions under the Clean Water Act (CWA). Think of it like this: when a developer or company applies for a Section 404 permit—which they need if they plan to dredge or fill in wetlands or certain waters—the EPA Administrator has the power to restrict or veto the use of that specific area for waste disposal.

The New Clock on Environmental Restrictions

This bill introduces a hard deadline for that EPA restriction power. Under the new rules (SEC. 2.), any restriction the EPA puts on a piece of land starts the moment the applicant submits a complete permit application. Crucially, that restriction period automatically ends the second the Secretary (usually the Army Corps of Engineers, which handles the permit issuance) issues the final permit. The idea is to remove the uncertainty of having the EPA restriction hanging over the project indefinitely once the main permit decision is made. For applicants—say, a company building a new warehouse or a large infrastructure project—this is a clear win for predictable timelines.

What This Means for Developers vs. Communities

For anyone seeking a CWA permit, this is a significant streamlining measure. It means they know exactly when the EPA’s temporary restriction power is off the table, which helps with planning and financing. If you’re a project manager waiting on a critical permit, this certainty is valuable. However, this change is a double-edged sword when it comes to oversight. The EPA’s ability to impose restrictions—even temporary ones—is a key tool for protecting sensitive areas from potential waste disposal.

By tying the end of the restriction period directly to the permit issuance, the bill effectively shortens the window for EPA oversight. If the Secretary issues the permit quickly, the EPA’s ability to maintain a restriction based on environmental findings is severely limited. For local communities near a proposed development, especially if they are concerned about the environmental impact of waste disposal (think contaminated runoff or habitat destruction), this shortened window reduces the time the EPA can proactively manage the land use during the review process. While the bill retains the requirement for “notice and opportunity for public hearings” before the EPA imposes any restriction, the overall effect is to prioritize permitting speed over extended regulatory caution.