This bill authorizes the Attorney General to reimburse state and local governments for the wages, including overtime, paid to employees performing immigration enforcement functions under federal agreement.
Laurel Lee
Representative
FL-15
The Reimbursements for Immigration Partnerships with Police to allow Local Enforcement Act of 2025 (RIPPLE Act) authorizes the Attorney General to reimburse state and local governments for the costs associated with performing federal immigration enforcement functions. This reimbursement specifically covers employee wages, including overtime compensation, incurred under official partnership agreements. The Act aims to financially support local law enforcement agencies that assist in federal immigration duties.
The “Reimbursements for Immigration Partnerships with Police to allow Local Enforcement Act of 2025,” or the RIPPLE Act, sets up a clear system for the federal government to pay back state and local police departments when they take on federal immigration enforcement duties. Specifically, Section 2 of this bill authorizes the Attorney General to reimburse local and state governments for the wages, including overtime, paid to their employees who perform immigration functions under existing federal agreements (known as 287(g) agreements).
Think of this as the federal government offering to pick up the tab for certain local police work. Currently, local agencies often incur significant costs—like officer salaries, training, and especially overtime—when they agree to act as an extension of federal immigration enforcement. This bill is designed to eliminate that financial hurdle by ensuring that if a local police officer spends eight hours processing federal immigration paperwork or transporting detainees, the federal government will reimburse the local jurisdiction for that officer's time, including any overtime triggered by the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.
For a small-town police department, this is a clear financial incentive. If the department is already strapped for cash, the promise of federal reimbursement for officer wages could make the difference in deciding whether to sign a 287(g) agreement. This provision directly benefits local government budgets by shifting the labor cost of federal enforcement away from local taxpayers. It also means that the federal government gains significant manpower without having to hire and train a corresponding number of federal agents.
While the financial relief for local budgets is a clear benefit, this provision raises questions about local priorities and community impact. When federal money is tied directly to performing federal immigration functions, it can incentivize local police to prioritize these duties over traditional community policing needs—like responding to local crime or traffic issues. This is often called “mission creep,” where the local police focus shifts because of the funding structure.
For immigrant communities, this financial mechanism could translate into a noticeable increase in enforcement presence from local officers they previously relied on for routine public safety. If local police are now financially compensated to perform federal immigration duties, it could erode community trust and make residents less likely to report local crimes, fearing that any interaction with local law enforcement could lead to federal immigration consequences. The bill’s mechanism is strictly about reimbursement, but that reimbursement acts as a powerful signal and incentive to expand local involvement in a federal mandate.