PolicyBrief
H.R. 388
119th CongressJan 14th 2025
Cattle Fever Tick Eradication Program Enhancement Act
IN COMMITTEE

The Cattle Fever Tick Eradication Program Enhancement Act requires a review of the Cattle Fever Tick Eradication Program to improve its effectiveness and reduce burdens on cattle producers, followed by a report to Congress with recommendations.

Mónica De La Cruz
R

Mónica De La Cruz

Representative

TX-15

LEGISLATION

New Bill Mandates Review of Cattle Fever Tick Program: Focuses on Efficiency and Reducing Producer Burdens

The "Cattle Fever Tick Eradication Program Enhancement Act" orders a top-to-bottom review of the existing Cattle Fever Tick Eradication Program, aiming to make it more effective and less of a headache for cattle producers.

What's Getting a Check-Up?

The bill, in Section 2, specifically tasks the Secretary of Agriculture with hiring a land-grant college or university (or a non-land grant college of agriculture) to conduct a thorough review of the program. This isn't just a quick glance; it's a deep dive into how the program is working (or not working) in the real world.

The review, due within one year of the contract being signed, will look at:

  • Effectiveness: Is the program actually preventing and reducing tick-borne illnesses in cattle?
  • Impact on Producers: What are the benefits and the burdens of complying with the program for cattle producers? This includes the practical stuff, like time, money, and resources spent on compliance.
  • Treatment Methods: What methods are being used, and are they the best options?
  • Funding Breakdown: A detailed account of where Federal and State money went in the most recent fiscal year, down to individual research projects.

Real-World Implications

Imagine a rancher constantly dealing with inspections, treatments, and paperwork related to cattle fever ticks. This bill aims to figure out if those procedures are actually necessary, efficient, and fairly funded. If the review finds that certain requirements are overly burdensome or ineffective, it could lead to significant changes.

For example, if a particular treatment is found to be costly and time-consuming for ranchers, but not very effective, the review might recommend exploring alternative methods. Or, if the funding isn't being used in the most impactful way, it could be redirected to more promising research or support for producers.

What's Next?

Within one year of the contract being signed, the Secretary of Agriculture must submit a report to the House and Senate Agriculture Committees. This report will contain the full review and, crucially, recommendations for improvement. The bill specifically highlights reducing compliance burdens for cattle producers as a key area for these recommendations (SEC. 2).

While this bill doesn't guarantee changes, it sets in motion a process that could lead to a more streamlined and effective Cattle Fever Tick Eradication Program. It's all about making sure the program is working as intended, both for the health of the cattle and the well-being of the people who raise them. The requirement for specific funding allocation details also increases transparency, letting everyone see exactly where the money is going.

One potential challenge, it should be noted, is ensuring the independence of the review. The chosen college or university will need to conduct a truly objective assessment, free from undue influence by any particular interest group.