This Act extends funding allocation rules for sport fish restoration, removes spending caps for the Interstate Fisheries Commission, prioritizes alternative fuel infrastructure for recreational boating, and reduces the excise tax on portable, electronically-aerated bait containers.
Debbie Dingell
Representative
MI-6
The Sport Fish Restoration, Recreational Boating Safety, and Wildlife Restoration Act of 2025 extends the timeline for current Sport Fish Restoration funding allocation rules until 2031 and removes the spending cap for Interstate Fisheries Commission activities. The bill also updates boating infrastructure priorities to specifically include funding for alternative marine fuel facilities for larger vessels. Finally, it significantly reduces the federal excise tax rate on portable, electronically-aerated bait containers from 10 percent to 3 percent.
The Sport Fish Restoration, Recreational Boating Safety, and Wildlife Restoration Act of 2025 is essentially a maintenance and modernization bill for outdoor recreation funding. It tackles a few different areas, from stabilizing conservation grants to promoting greener fuels and even making a specific piece of fishing gear cheaper. At its core, this bill ensures that the mechanisms funding state fish and wildlife programs stay on track for the next few years.
If you’re involved in state-level conservation or fisheries management, the biggest news here is stability. This Act pushes back the expiration date for the existing funding formulas used by the Dingell-Johnson Sport Fish Restoration Act from 2026 to 2031 (Section 2). Think of this as renewing the lease on a critical piece of infrastructure funding. These formulas dictate how money collected from fishing gear and motorboat fuel taxes gets distributed to state agencies for things like fish stocking, public access sites, and habitat restoration. Extending this timeline means state agencies can plan their long-term projects—like renovating a boat ramp or conducting a five-year fish population study—without worrying that the funding rules are about to change.
Section 3 makes two key adjustments for the Interstate Fisheries Commission, which coordinates management across state lines. First, it removes the old, hard spending cap of $1,200,000 on how much money the Commission could draw from the total annual appropriation. Instead of a fixed ceiling, they can now use an 'appropriate amount.' Second, it updates their minimum guaranteed funding. Previously, they were guaranteed at least $200,000. Now, their minimum is the greater of $200,000 or 0.0375 percent of the total annual appropriation. If the total pot of funds grows significantly, this change ensures the Commission’s budget keeps pace, giving them more resources to manage shared resources like migratory fish populations.
For boat owners and marina operators, Section 4 introduces a significant change to how federal Boating Infrastructure Grant money can be used. States can now prioritize funding for projects related to alternative fuels for larger, non-trailerable recreational boats. This is a clear signal to the market that the focus is shifting toward sustainability. This means that infrastructure money can now be used to build or upgrade facilities that pump “drop-in alternative marine fuels”—which the bill defines as specific renewable diesel, biodiesel blends, or gasoline with high renewable content—directly into larger vessels. For a marina owner, this opens up a new avenue for federal funding to modernize their fueling stations and cater to boaters looking for lower-carbon options.
Perhaps the most immediate cost-saving measure in the bill is found in Section 5, which deals with the federal excise tax on fishing equipment. If you’ve ever bought one of those specialized, portable containers that use a battery and electronics to keep your bait aerated and alive, you’ve paid a 10 percent excise tax on it. This Act slashes that tax rate down to just 3 percent for those specific items, effective immediately upon the bill becoming law. This 70 percent reduction in tax should translate directly into lower manufacturing costs, and potentially lower retail prices, for anglers who rely on this gear to keep their minnows and worms fresh on the water.