The True Justice Act of 2025 establishes a five-year, \$50 million grant program administered by the Attorney General to improve and fund legal representation and training for public defenders immediately following an arrest.
Summer Lee
Representative
PA-12
The True Justice Act of 2025 establishes a new grant program administered by the Attorney General to significantly improve public defense services nationwide. These funds are designated for providing legal representation to indigent defendants immediately following arrest and for specialized training of defense attorneys. Congress further affirms its belief that the constitutional right to counsel must extend to all post-arrest proceedings, not just the initial trial.
The newly proposed True Justice Act of 2025 is looking to tackle one of the biggest bottlenecks in the criminal justice system: the lack of timely, quality legal representation for people who can’t afford a lawyer. This bill sets up a new federal grant program, managed by the Attorney General, specifically authorizing $50 million per year from Fiscal Year 2026 through 2030 to bolster public defense services across the country (SEC. 2).
If you’ve ever watched a courtroom drama, you know about the Miranda rights, but the reality of public defense often falls short, especially in the critical hours right after an arrest. This bill aims to fix that by making sure grant money is used to pay for legal help starting immediately after someone is arrested and continuing through their first court appearance (SEC. 2). Think about the difference that makes: instead of sitting in a holding cell, possibly making decisions that hurt their case, someone gets access to a lawyer who can advise them on bail, charges, and their rights from the jump. This is a huge deal for ensuring fairness in the early stages of a case, which often determine the outcome.
This isn't just about throwing money at the problem; it’s about targeted investment. The grants are available to states, local governments, and public defender offices. A key provision is that the Attorney General must consider two factors when deciding how much money to hand out: the cost of new technology or training the applicants need, and the sheer size of the justice system they serve (SEC. 2). For example, a busy county public defender’s office in a large metro area would be compared to the size of its state’s system to determine its relative need. This attempts to tailor the funding to where the caseload pressure is highest.
Beyond direct representation, the bill also includes dedicated funding for training grants. These grants will go toward teaching public defenders, court-appointed lawyers, and contract attorneys the best ways to represent clients in criminal proceedings (SEC. 2). For the average public defender—who is often overworked and underpaid—this means access to better professional development, which in turn means better defense for their clients. It’s a classic two-for-one benefit: better resources for the lawyers, better outcomes for the accused.
While the intent is clearly beneficial, the bill gives the Attorney General significant leeway in how the grant program is run. Applicants must provide “whatever information the Attorney General reasonably asks for” when applying for funds (SEC. 2). This broad administrative authority means the rules for applying could be complex and demanding, potentially creating a heavy lift for smaller, under-resourced public defender offices trying to secure the funding they desperately need. It’s a point worth watching to ensure the application process doesn't become a barrier to entry for the very groups this bill is meant to help.
Finally, the bill includes a Sense of Congress affirming that the right to a lawyer, established by the Supreme Court in Gideon v. Wainwright, should apply to every single step of the legal process after someone is taken into custody (SEC. 3). While a "Sense of Congress" doesn't change the law, it sends a clear message that the legislative branch believes access to counsel is a continuous right, not just one that kicks in at the trial stage. This act is a concrete step toward making that ideal a reality, injecting $50 million annually into the system to address the chronic underfunding of public defense.