This bill mandates a Department of Defense study on the feasibility and impact of providing housing for civilian workers at four key naval shipyards.
Jennifer Kiggans
Representative
VA-2
The Defense Shipyard Workforce Housing Act of 2025 mandates a Department of Defense study to assess the feasibility, costs, and benefits of providing housing for civilian workers at four key naval shipyards. This comprehensive review will examine options for building or leasing housing and its potential impact on recruitment and retention. The findings, including recommendations, must be reported to Congress within 18 months of enactment.
The Defense Shipyard Workforce Housing Act of 2025 is kicking off a detailed, 18-month study by the Department of Defense (DoD) to figure out if it makes sense—financially and operationally—to provide apartment or dorm-style housing for civilian workers at four critical naval shipyards. This isn't about immediate construction; it’s about getting the data first. The four locations under the microscope are Norfolk Naval Shipyard (Virginia), Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard (Hawaii), Portsmouth Naval Shipyard (Maine), and Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (Washington), all places where housing costs often make hiring and keeping staff tough.
This study, mandated by Section 2, is a direct response to the real-world squeeze on shipyard workers. These are the people keeping our Navy running, but they often struggle to find affordable places to live near their jobs, especially in high-cost areas like Hawaii or the Seattle metro area. The DoD has to analyze the estimated costs for building, maintaining, or leasing these housing units, and then weigh those against the potential upsides. The big question is whether providing housing is the key to better hiring and worker retention, which directly impacts the Navy's ability to maintain its fleet.
One of the most interesting parts of the study (Section 2) involves looking at the administrative side of things, specifically how they would collect rent. The DoD must examine the options for taking housing fees or rent directly out of employee paychecks. While this sounds convenient, it’s a provision that needs careful scrutiny: if the housing is mandatory or the fees are high, mandatory deductions could create financial strain or administrative headaches for workers if not managed transparently. For the average shipyard mechanic or engineer, this means the difference between a simple, affordable housing solution and a new layer of payroll complexity.
The study isn't starting from scratch. The DoD is required to compare its potential shipyard housing models against existing housing solutions used by the DoD or other federal agencies. This comparison will help ensure they aren't reinventing the wheel and can adopt best practices. They must also include case studies from at least two of the covered shipyards to ground the analysis in real data. This effort recognizes that what works in Norfolk might not fly in Pearl Harbor. The clock is ticking: the Secretary of Defense has 18 months from the date the Act becomes law to deliver a detailed report to Congress laying out all the findings, costs, and recommendations. Only after Congress reviews that data will we know if this idea moves from paper to pavement.