The FARE Act establishes an advisory committee to study barriers and recommend solutions for electrifying the nation's railroads.
Kevin Mullin
Representative
CA-15
The FARE Act establishes the Advisory Committee on Rail Electrification, tasked with identifying barriers to electrifying the nation's railroads. This committee will bring together diverse stakeholders to recommend solutions and necessary research and development. The committee's findings and recommendations will be reported regularly to Congress.
The newly proposed Forging Ahead on Rail Electrification Act (FARE Act) isn't about immediate change; it's about setting up a 10-year study group to figure out how to transition America’s rail system—both passenger and freight—away from diesel and toward electric power. This bill, specifically Section 2, immediately establishes the Advisory Committee on Rail Electrification, overseen by the Chairman of the Surface Transportation Board (STB). The committee’s core mission is to pinpoint the biggest obstacles stopping railroads from switching to electric power and recommend the research and development needed to overcome those hurdles.
Think of this committee as the long-game strategy team for decarbonizing rail. They aren't writing new rules or handing out grants right now. They are creating a roadmap. If you work in the rail industry, this is the group that will shape the future of your infrastructure, from the locomotives you build to the tracks you maintain. The committee’s mandate is to look at everything from the cost of building new electric infrastructure to the technology gaps that currently exist. For example, they might look at how a utility company in the Midwest can manage the massive power demand needed to run electric freight trains across thousands of miles.
The STB Chairman has to make sure this committee includes a "good mix" of people affected by electrification. This means you’ll see representatives from freight railroads (the big players moving goods), passenger railroads (like Amtrak), electric utilities (the folks who power the grid), equipment manufacturers (the people who build the trains and overhead wires), state governments, and federal agencies. This diversity is key because electrifying a rail line is a massive infrastructure project that touches everything from energy policy to local zoning laws. The good news is that having all these stakeholders in one room means the recommendations should be practical and holistic. The less good news is that the STB Chairman has the sole power to appoint these members, meaning the initial focus of the committee rests entirely on their judgment.
This advisory group isn't permanent; it’s designed to shut down automatically after 10 years. Before then, the STB Chairman must deliver the committee’s findings and recommendations to key congressional committees—specifically the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee and the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee. The first report is due within two years of the bill becoming law, with updates coming every two years after that. For the average person, this means that while the cost of running this new committee will be borne by taxpayers, the upside is that Congress will start receiving actionable, expert-vetted advice on how to modernize rail, potentially leading to future legislation that could reduce emissions and improve efficiency in the movement of goods and people.