This Act immediately repeals specific Executive Orders that harm LGBTQI+ individuals and prohibits the use of federal funds to enforce them, while preserving the President's constitutional authority.
Becca Balint
Representative
VT
The No Place for LGBTQ+ Hate Act immediately repeals specific Executive Orders that reportedly targeted or limited the rights of LGBTQI individuals across federal areas like employment and healthcare. This legislation also prohibits the use of any federal funds to enforce or carry out these canceled orders. The bill includes a savings provision to ensure it does not infringe upon the President's existing constitutional authority.
The newly proposed No Place for LGBTQ+ Hate Act is a direct and swift action aimed at reversing specific policies put in place by previous presidential administrations. Think of it like hitting the 'undo' button on five different executive orders that reportedly restricted the rights and protections of LGBTQI individuals—specifically, Executive Orders 14168, 14183, 14187, 14201, and 14190.
Section 2 of the Act gets straight to the point: any Executive Orders that specifically target lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or intersex (LGBTQI) individuals in a way that harms or limits their rights are immediately canceled. They lose all power and effect. This is a big deal, especially for an order like 14168, which was flagged for potentially forcing discrimination against transgender, nonbinary, intersex, and gender-nonconforming people in areas like jobs, schools, housing, and healthcare. If you’re a trans person trying to get a proper federal ID marker, or a gay couple seeking housing, this repeal is intended to remove those policy roadblocks.
Beyond just canceling the orders, the bill deals a powerful second blow by cutting off the money supply. Using the power Congress has over federal spending (the Spending Clause), the Act explicitly forbids the use of any federal funds to implement, manage, enforce, or carry out any of those canceled Executive Orders. In plain terms: even if a federal agency wanted to keep following the spirit of the old orders, they wouldn't have a budget to do it. This is the practical lock-down on the policy, ensuring that the changes aren't just symbolic but are enforced financially.
There is one interesting technical detail tucked away in Section 3, the Savings Provision. This section is a legal formality that ensures the Act doesn't accidentally chip away at the President's existing constitutional authority. It clarifies that nothing in this new law is meant to limit what the President can already do under the Constitution. While this is standard legal language, it’s worth noting because it means that while these specific past orders are gone, the underlying authority of the President to issue executive orders in general remains untouched. This provision acts as a safety net for the executive branch's power, but it also means that a future administration could potentially craft new, similarly restrictive policies under their inherent authority, though they would face the funding restriction established in Section 2.