PolicyBrief
H.R. 3704
119th CongressJun 4th 2025
Coordinated Federal Response to Extreme Heat Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

This Act establishes a coordinated federal response to extreme heat by creating an interagency committee and a National Integrated Heat Health Information System within NOAA to reduce heat-related health risks.

Yassamin Ansari
D

Yassamin Ansari

Representative

AZ-3

LEGISLATION

Federal Heatwave Response Gets $5M Annual Budget: New Bill Demands Open Data on Extreme Heat Risks

This bill, the Coordinated Federal Response to Extreme Heat Act of 2025, is essentially the federal government finally admitting that extreme heat is a serious, coordinated threat, not just a weather report. It aims to build a national defense system against heatwaves by standardizing data, coordinating efforts across nearly every major federal agency, and backing it up with $5 million in annual funding through 2029.

The New Federal Heat Squad

The core of the Act is the creation of the National Integrated Heat Health Information System Interagency Committee (NIHHIS Committee), housed within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Think of this as the federal government’s new heat task force. It’s a massive undertaking, requiring participation from representatives across the Departments of Commerce, Health and Human Services (HHS), Energy, Labor (OSHA), FEMA, EPA, and many more. If you’ve ever tried to coordinate a group text with more than five people, you know this is ambitious. The idea is to stop different agencies from working in silos—NOAA predicting the heat, HHS dealing with the sick, and FEMA handling the disaster response—and force them to work together from the start.

This Committee is immediately tasked with creating a five-year strategic plan within two years of the bill passing. This plan will map out how the federal government is going to reduce heat-related sickness and death. For everyday people, this means that the official guidance on when to close schools, when to check on elderly neighbors, or when to adjust construction worker shifts should become much more unified and evidence-based, rather than relying on local guesswork.

Open Data: Your Right to Know the Heat Risk

Beyond the Committee, the bill formally establishes the National Integrated Heat Health Information System (NIHHIS) itself, managed by NOAA. The system’s job is to gather, archive, and distribute better forecasts, warnings, and predictions about extreme heat events. This is where the bill gets really important for researchers, local planners, and even journalists: it mandates that all the data associated with NIHHIS must be completely open and available to the public. If you’re a city planner trying to figure out where to put new cooling centers, or a public health official modeling how many hospital beds you’ll need next summer, this open, standardized data is critical.

However, the bill defines “Extreme Heat” somewhat broadly—as heat that is “significantly worse than what’s normal for that area.” While this makes sense geographically (what’s extreme in Seattle is normal in Phoenix), it means NOAA will have to issue detailed, technical rules to make sure this definition is applied consistently across the country. This is a critical detail, as the official definition will trigger specific federal responses and funding.

What This Means for Your Town and Your Wallet

The most direct impact for the public is the promise of better, more accurate warnings. If you’re a construction worker, an agricultural laborer, or someone who works outdoors, the involvement of OSHA and the standardization of warnings should lead to clearer, faster alerts about dangerous working conditions. If you’re a parent, better planning by local governments, informed by this federal data, could mean more reliable access to cooling centers or clearer policies on school closures during heatwaves.

The bill authorizes $5 million annually for five years (FY 2025 through FY 2029) to fund this new system and the massive interagency coordination effort. While this is a relatively small amount in the context of the federal budget, it’s dedicated money for a problem that currently costs the economy billions in lost productivity and healthcare expenses. Taxpayers, of course, foot the bill, but the goal is to save money and lives in the long run through proactive preparation rather than reactive disaster response.