The "States' Education Reclamation Act of 2025" abolishes the Department of Education, redirects federal education funding to states as grants with administrative and fiscal accountability requirements, and transfers remaining federal education programs to other federal departments.
David Rouzer
Representative
NC-7
The "States' Education Reclamation Act of 2025" abolishes the Department of Education, transferring its programs to other federal departments and providing states with grants equivalent to their 2025 federal education funding. States must use these funds for elementary, secondary, and postsecondary education, adhering to state laws and maintaining fiscal accountability through annual audits and reports. The Act also prohibits discrimination in programs funded by these grants and requires a plan for the Department of Education's closure. Finally, the Government Accountability Office must submit a report reviewing the feasibility of funding education by lowering the federal tax burden and ending federal grants for education programs.
The States' Education Reclamation Act of 2025 is a massive overhaul of the U.S. education system, essentially hitting the 'delete' button on the federal Department of Education. The bill, effective immediately, redirects billions in federal education funding directly to state governments, giving them complete control over how that money is spent. This is a fundamental shift from federal oversight to state-level autonomy, based on the argument that states and local communities are better equipped to manage education.
The core of the bill is the abolition of the Department of Education (SEC. 3). Instead of federal programs and oversight, states will receive block grants equivalent to what they received in federal funding for the fiscal year 2025 (SEC. 4). This money, coming directly from the Treasury, is earmarked for both K-12 and higher education. States can use these funds for anything permitted by their own state laws, including boosting teacher salaries (SEC. 4(d)). Think of it like this: instead of Washington deciding how your local schools spend federal money, your state legislature will have that power.
While states get a lot more freedom, there's a catch: strict accountability (SEC. 5). Each state must hire an independent auditor, approved by both the state's governor and the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, to track every dollar of these grants (SEC. 5(b, c)). Audit results are due annually to both the state legislature and the Treasury by April 30th, starting in 2026 (SEC. 5(d)). If a state misuses the funds – say, by spending it on something not allowed under section 4, or by using the grant to replace existing state funding instead of supplementing it – they have to pay back 100% of the misused amount (SEC. 5(e)). That's a serious financial penalty. These reports will also be publicly available online (SEC. 5(g)).
While the Department of Education vanishes, some key programs are getting reassigned (SEC. 7). Within 24 months, job training programs move to the Department of Labor, special education grants go to Health and Human Services, and Indian education programs shift to the Department of the Interior. Impact Aid (funding for school districts with federal properties like military bases) lands at the Department of Defense. Crucially, the massive Federal Pell Grant and student loan programs will be managed by the Department of the Treasury (SEC. 7(e, f)). This keeps these programs running, but under completely different management.
The bill includes a non-discrimination clause (SEC. 6), prohibiting discrimination based on disability, sex, race, color, or national origin in any program funded by these grants. The Attorney General is responsible for enforcing this, and can take legal action if states don't comply (SEC. 6(b)).
However, big questions remain. The bill assumes states are better equipped to handle education, but there's a real risk of unequal resource distribution between states. Wealthier states might thrive, while poorer states could struggle, potentially widening the education gap. The bill also relies heavily on state-level audits, raising concerns about potential inconsistencies or even biased reporting. It's a massive shift, and the long-term consequences are far from certain.