PolicyBrief
H.R. 3680
119th CongressJun 3rd 2025
No Corporate Crooks Act
IN COMMITTEE

This act prohibits individuals convicted of specific financial and corruption-related crimes as a CEO from serving in the executive branch of the government.

Chris Deluzio
D

Chris Deluzio

Representative

PA-17

LEGISLATION

No Corporate Crooks Act Bans CEOs Convicted of Fraud, Wage Theft from Executive Branch Jobs

The aptly named No Corporate Crooks Act is short, direct, and has one clear mission: to bar individuals convicted of serious corporate crimes while serving as a CEO from holding positions in the executive branch of the federal government. This isn't about minor infractions; the bill targets former chief executive officers (CEOs) who have been convicted of a "covered crime," immediately disqualifying them from appointment or service.

The Integrity Check: Who’s Out?

If you were a CEO and got convicted of certain crimes, the door to a government job in the executive branch slams shut. The bill lists a wide range of offenses that trigger this ban, including heavy hitters like Bribery, Fraud, Insider Trading, Embezzlement, and Tax Evasion. But it also includes crimes that hit closer to home for working people, specifically Wage Theft and Cybercrime.

This means if a former CEO was convicted of systematically withholding overtime pay from employees—the definition of wage theft—that person is permanently ineligible for a role in, say, the Department of Labor or the Department of Commerce. The logic here is straightforward: if you demonstrated a willingness to break the law for corporate gain, you shouldn't be given the keys to the public trust.

Immediate Removal Mandate

What if someone slips through the cracks and is already working in the executive branch when this conviction surfaces? The bill is clear: if the government finds out that a current employee was convicted of one of these crimes while they were a CEO, that person must be removed immediately from their service or employment. There’s no grace period, no appeal process mentioned for staying in the job, and no distinction made for whether the conviction happened last year or twenty years ago.

This provision is designed to ensure that the integrity standard is maintained across the board, affecting both new appointments and current staff. For the average person, this is about confidence—knowing that the people making decisions about your taxes, regulations, and public services haven't already proven they'll abuse their power for personal or corporate benefit.

The Fine Print: Where Things Get Interesting

While the core intent of increasing government integrity is beneficial, the list of disqualifying crimes is worth a closer look. Most of the crimes—fraud, bribery, corruption—make perfect sense in this context. However, the list also includes Copyright Infringement. While a serious offense, it sits slightly awkwardly next to crimes like embezzlement and insider trading, which involve massive financial malfeasance and public trust violations. The bill treats a CEO convicted of large-scale software piracy the same as one convicted of running a major tax fraud scheme, imposing the same lifelong ban on public service.

This bill restricts the career options for a very specific group: convicted former CEOs. For the agencies looking to hire specialized talent, this means they lose access to experienced individuals, even if the conviction happened decades ago and the person has since reformed. The bill prioritizes a zero-tolerance policy on past corporate misconduct over potential expertise, betting that the gain in public trust outweighs the loss of a potentially qualified, albeit convicted, candidate.