PolicyBrief
H.R. 3655
119th CongressMay 29th 2025
STAR Plus Scholarship Act
IN COMMITTEE

The STAR Plus Scholarship Act establishes a federal program to fund scholarships for students entering substance use disorder and mental health professions in exchange for mandatory service in designated shortage areas.

Andrea Salinas
D

Andrea Salinas

Representative

OR-6

LEGISLATION

STAR Plus Scholarship Act Offers Tuition for Mental Health Workers Willing to Serve in High-Need Areas

If you’ve ever tried to find a good therapist or addiction specialist in a rural area or a busy, underserved city, you know how tough it is. The STAR Plus Scholarship Act is a direct shot at fixing that workforce shortage, and it does it by offering future mental health and substance use disorder (SUD) professionals a sweet deal: free tuition in exchange for service.

This new federal program, run by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), is essentially a contract. The government pays for your tuition and other reasonable educational expenses—meaning no more crippling student loan debt for a master’s degree or PhD. In return, you sign a contract promising to work full-time in a designated mental health shortage area for a period equal to the time you received the scholarship funding (Section 2). So, if they pay for three years of school, you owe three years of service.

The Real-World Exchange: Funding for Fieldwork

For students looking at $50,000 to $100,000 in debt just to get certified, this is massive. The bill even makes sure the scholarship money isn't counted as taxable income, which is a huge win for maximizing the benefit. The goal is to flood areas that desperately need help. A "shortage area" is defined broadly: it could be a county with a high drug overdose death rate, or any facility the Secretary designates as needing mental health professionals, including private practices (Section 2). This means if you’re a soon-to-be social worker, counselor, or psychiatrist, you could be setting up shop in a community that currently has almost no one available to treat patients.

HRSA is required to prioritize two types of applicants: those who show they are most likely to stay in the shortage area after their required service time is up, and those who come from groups currently underrepresented in the mental health workforce (Section 2). This is a smart move aimed at building long-term capacity in these communities, not just dropping people in temporarily.

The Fine Print: What Happens If You Bail?

Like any contract, this one comes with serious consequences if you don’t hold up your end of the bargain. If you accept the scholarship but don't complete your service obligation, you face liquidated damages (Section 2). While the bill says the Secretary will set up a formula for these damages, it’s a significant financial risk you take on. They are required to give you a clear summary of these penalties upfront, written in plain language, so there’s no excuse for being surprised later.

Here’s an interesting detail: the bill creates a special “Replacement Fund” financed by the money collected from people who breach their contracts. If a clinic loses a therapist because they broke their service agreement, the clinic can tap into this fund to recruit and hire a replacement. This is a practical measure designed to keep care flowing and prevent the community from being punished when an individual defaults on their commitment.

The Big Picture and the Catch

This program is authorized to spend up to $75 million annually between fiscal years 2026 and 2030. That’s a serious investment aimed at boosting the number of professionals treating addiction and mental health issues—two of the biggest public health challenges right now. For everyday people, this means better access to care, potentially closer to home, and shorter wait times to see a specialist.

However, there is one important catch buried in the contract requirements: the government’s financial obligation to pay for these scholarships is explicitly dependent on Congress actually appropriating the money for the program (Section 2). So, while you can sign the contract agreeing to the service, the government’s ability to fund your education is not a 100% guarantee unless Congress follows through with the annual funding.