This act clarifies that the use of force against protesters by law enforcement is a deprivation of rights under color of law and removes the death penalty as a potential sentence for such violations.
Ilhan Omar
Representative
MN-5
The Protecting Our Protesters Act of 2025 clarifies that the use of force against protesters by government officials constitutes a deprivation of rights under color of law. This update strengthens existing federal law regarding civil rights violations by law enforcement. Additionally, the bill revises sentencing provisions by removing the possibility of the death penalty in these specific cases.
The Protecting Our Protesters Act of 2025 is short, but it makes two very specific, high-impact changes to federal law regarding civil rights violations by government officials. Essentially, this bill is about making sure there’s a clear legal path when things go sideways during a protest.
This legislation updates Section 242 of title 18 of the U.S. Code. That’s the section that deals with government officials—like police officers or federal agents—who misuse their authority, or act “under color of law,” to violate someone’s constitutional rights. The core change here is clarification. The bill explicitly states that if an official uses force while responding to a protest or demonstration, that action absolutely counts as acting “under color of law” for the purpose of this federal civil rights statute (SEC. 2. Clarifying Deprivation of Rights).
Why does this matter? For the average person, this means if you are protesting peacefully and an official uses excessive force against you, the legal framework for holding that official accountable at the federal level just got a lot clearer. It removes any ambiguity about whether the officer was acting in an official capacity, which can be a major hurdle in these kinds of cases. It provides a clearer legal foundation for people whose rights are violated during public demonstrations, strengthening the right to assemble without fear of official overreach.
The second change is a major cleanup in sentencing. The bill removes the phrase that previously allowed for the death penalty as a potential punishment for these specific civil rights violations under Section 242. While the death penalty was rarely, if ever, applied for these crimes, removing it aligns the statute with modern trends in federal criminal justice reform (SEC. 2. Clarifying Deprivation of Rights). For those of us who follow sentencing policy, this is primarily a statutory modernization, ensuring the law reflects current norms regarding the most severe penalties.
Think about a city worker, maybe a software developer or a construction foreman, who takes a few hours off to join a local demonstration about zoning or environmental issues. If that person is injured by excessive force from an officer, this bill ensures the federal statute is crystal clear: that officer’s actions are immediately considered official conduct under federal law. This doesn't create a new crime, but it significantly clarifies the scope of an existing, powerful civil rights protection. While this is good news for protesters and civil liberties groups, it also means law enforcement agencies will face increased legal scrutiny and liability under this federal statute, requiring clear policies on the use of force during demonstrations.