PolicyBrief
H.R. 364
119th CongressJan 13th 2025
Territorial Tax Equity and Economic Growth Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

The Territorial Tax Equity and Economic Growth Act of 2025 updates residency requirements and income sourcing rules for U.S. territories to standardize tax treatment for individuals and businesses.

Stacey Plaskett
D

Stacey Plaskett

Representative

VI

LEGISLATION

Territorial Tax Equity Act Sets New 122-Day Residency Rule and Reshapes Income Sourcing for U.S. Possessions

If you’ve ever thought about moving your remote work setup to a beach in Puerto Rico or Guam to catch a tax break, the IRS is about to check your passport much more closely. The Territorial Tax Equity and Economic Growth Act of 2025 is looking to tighten the leash on who qualifies as a "bona fide resident" of U.S. territories. Starting in 2025, the bill replaces the old, somewhat flexible residency rules with a hard-and-fast "substantial presence" test. Instead of the current 31-day minimum, you’ll need to be physically present in the territory for at least 122 days during the tax year to claim residency status. This isn’t just a minor tweak; it’s a significant jump that could catch seasonal residents or digital nomads off guard, especially since the bill explicitly removes common exceptions for things like medical emergencies or student status (Section 2).

The 122-Day Hurdle

For someone like a specialized consultant who splits time between a home in the U.S. Virgin Islands and clients in the States, this change is a game-changer. Under the new rules, you can't just maintain a "tax home" there; you have to physically be there for roughly four months of the year. By adopting the same residency math the U.S. uses for foreign nationals, the bill aims to ensure that tax benefits stay with people who actually live and spend money in the territories. However, for a student from Guam studying on the mainland or a resident who needs extended medical care in the States, the removal of those "customary exceptions" means they could suddenly lose their territorial tax status through no fault of their own.

Sourcing the Side Hustle

The bill also dives into the weeds of where your money actually "comes from" for tax purposes. It adjusts the rules for income earned outside a territory, stating that U.S.-source income is only tied to a territorial business if it’s truly attributable to a fixed office or place of business (Section 2). Think of a small software firm based in American Samoa that does some auxiliary coding work in a temporary U.S. office. Under this bill, that minor U.S. activity won't automatically drag all that income into the U.S. tax net, provided the work is just "preparatory or auxiliary." It’s an attempt to provide some breathing room for territorial businesses to interact with the U.S. market without getting slammed by double taxation, but the "effectively connected" language is notoriously dense and could lead to some headaches for accountants trying to draw the line.

Sales and Long-Term Stakes

Finally, the legislation cleans up how the sale of personal property—like equipment or stocks—is handled, ensuring these sales follow the same territorial sourcing rules as other types of income. While the goal is to spark "economic growth" by creating a more predictable tax environment, the immediate reality for many will be increased record-keeping. If you’re a business owner in the Northern Mariana Islands, you’ll need to be much more precise about where your assets are sold and exactly how many days your key employees are spending on the island. The bill tries to balance fairness with growth, but for the average person juggling a cross-border life, it mostly means the era of "easy" territorial residency is coming to a close.