This Act establishes a pilot program for law enforcement to test drones equipped only with non-lethal tools for responding to active shooter situations.
Troy Nehls
Representative
TX-22
The Deescalation Drone Pilot Program Act of 2025 establishes a pilot program managed by the FAA for law enforcement to test drones equipped only with non-lethal tools during active shooter events. This initiative aims to assess the safety, training, and effectiveness of using these specialized drones to keep officers at a safer distance. Following the testing phase, the FAA must create a formal rulemaking process to allow agencies nationwide to seek approval for using these domestically manufactured, non-lethal drones.
The Deescalation Drone Pilot Program Act of 2025 is setting up a new tech test drive for law enforcement. Basically, the FAA has two months to kick off a pilot program that lets Federal, State, local, and Tribal police test out specialized drones during active shooter events. The catch—and it’s a big one—is that these drones can only carry non-lethal gear. We’re talking about things like cameras, speakers, strobe lights, or other non-lethal de-escalation tools, not firearms. The bill specifically reaffirms the ban on putting dangerous weapons on these aircraft, keeping the focus strictly on remote intervention and observation.
This pilot program is designed to figure out two things: First, how effective are these non-lethal drones at helping officers keep a safer distance while dealing with a threat? Second, what are the strict rules needed for training officers and keeping the skies safe? The FAA must work with law enforcement agencies, including those in large metro areas and rural groups, to figure out the best protocols. This is a crucial step because it forces the FAA to establish safety and operational rules before the technology is widely adopted. The goal is to bring a new layer of remote intervention to high-stress situations, potentially reducing the risk for both officers and the public.
One area that needs close attention is the definition of “Nonlethal Weapon.” The bill defines it as a device designed to temporarily stop a target while minimizing death or permanent injury. While this sounds good, even non-lethal tools—like high-intensity sound emitters or bright strobes—can be disruptive or cause unintended harm if misused. The core concern here isn't the technology itself, but how strictly the subsequent rulemaking process will define operational limits. If the definition of an “Active Shooter Event” is too broad, or if the rules allow for too much discretion, there’s a risk that these drones could be used in situations less severe than the life-or-death crises they are designed for, raising questions about civil liberties and increased aerial surveillance capabilities.
After the pilot program wraps up, the FAA must report its findings to Congress and, within 60 days of that report, start the formal process to create permanent rules for law enforcement use. Interestingly, the bill includes a clear requirement: any non-lethal drone approved for use under this program must be manufactured in the United States, based on the Federal Trade Commission’s definition. This is a direct boost for domestic drone manufacturers, essentially cutting out foreign competitors from this specific public safety market. While it aims to support US industry, it also means law enforcement agencies might be restricted from using the most advanced non-lethal drone technology if it happens to be developed overseas. For US drone manufacturers, this is a clear and immediate opportunity to get in on a potentially lucrative new government contract sector.