This act authorizes the relocation of a memorial honoring nine Air Force crew members lost in a 1982 training crash to the Stratton Ridge rest area, provided all costs are covered by non-federal sources.
Charles (Chuck) Edwards
Representative
NC-11
The Stratton Ridge Air Force Memorial Act authorizes the relocation of a memorial honoring nine Air Force crew members lost in a 1982 training crash. The Secretary of Agriculture can permit the move to the Stratton Ridge rest area, provided private landowner consent and approval from the North Carolina Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration are secured. Crucially, this act mandates that all costs associated with the relocation, installation, and maintenance must be covered entirely by non-federal funds.
The Stratton Ridge Air Force Memorial Act is an administrative bill focused on one specific task: authorizing the move of a memorial dedicated to nine Air Force crew members who died in a 1982 training mission crash. The memorial, currently on private land near the Cherohala Skyway in North Carolina, is slated to move to the Stratton Ridge rest area inside the Nantahala National Forest (Sec. 2).
Moving a memorial onto National Forest land isn't as simple as just hiring a moving truck. This bill sets up a clear, multi-step bureaucratic process. The Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to grant a special use authorization for the relocation, but only after getting the green light from the current private landowner (Sec. 2). On top of that, the proposed site at Stratton Ridge needs approval from the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). If the new location happens to be adjacent to a federally funded highway, the Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) also has to sign off (Sec. 2).
For the average person, this means that even a small, symbolic change like moving a memorial requires coordination between a private owner, the state's transport agency, and two different federal departments. It’s a good reminder that even on public lands, approvals are complex and depend on multiple agencies agreeing—a process that can often lead to delays.
Here’s the part that matters most to taxpayers: the bill explicitly states that no federal funds can be used for moving, installing, or maintaining this memorial (Sec. 2). Every dime has to come from the person or group requesting the relocation. This includes not just the physical costs of moving the monument, but also the administrative fees for processing the application, issuing the special use permit, and any environmental reviews required (Sec. 2).
If you're part of the group fundraising for this memorial, you're on the hook for everything—from the cement to the paperwork. While this ensures taxpayer money isn't spent on this specific project, it places a significant financial burden on the private entity, which must foot the bill for every federal hour spent reviewing the proposal. This provision is a clear firewall, ensuring the federal government’s role is purely administrative.
Finally, the Secretary of Agriculture has the authority to set any appropriate rules when granting the special use authorization (Sec. 2). The bill even suggests a specific condition that could be applied: preventing the memorial from ever getting bigger or expanding in the future. This is a common practice when dealing with permanent installations on public land, ensuring the use remains limited and doesn't creep beyond the initially approved footprint. For the families and friends involved, this means the memorial, once moved, is likely locked into its size and scope forever, preventing any later additions or major changes without a whole new legislative or administrative fight.