PolicyBrief
H.R. 3484
119th CongressSep 16th 2025
Business Owners Protection Act of 2025
AWAITING HOUSE

This act repeals specific unused authorities related to restricting mandatory predispute arbitration, modifying fiduciary duty regulations, and establishing standards of conduct for financial entities.

Garland "Andy" Barr
R

Garland "Andy" Barr

Representative

KY-6

LEGISLATION

New Bill Strips SEC Authority Over Mandatory Arbitration and Fiduciary Duties for Financial Firms

If you’ve ever felt like the deck is stacked against you when dealing with a big company, especially when it comes to your money, listen up. The so-called Business Owners Protection Act of 2025 is a short, sharp piece of legislation that systematically removes or reduces the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) power to protect individual investors. It’s essentially a regulatory diet plan for financial firms, but the investors are the ones who might end up feeling hungry.

The Fine Print on Financial Conflict

The biggest change here involves how you can fight back if your financial advisor or broker messes up. Section 2 of this bill repeals the SEC’s authority to restrict mandatory predispute arbitration. For those of us who aren't fluent in regulatory jargon, this means the SEC loses the ability to prevent financial firms from forcing you to sign away your right to sue them in court before you even open an account. If you have a dispute, you’d be stuck in private arbitration, a process often criticized for favoring the firms that rely on it. This provision directly limits the legal options available to individual investors seeking redress and shifts the power balance squarely toward the financial institutions.

Less Mandate, Less Oversight

Section 3 takes aim at the SEC's duties regarding fiduciary standards—the rules that dictate how financial professionals must act in your best interest. Under current law, the SEC is required to take specific actions to “facilitate” certain protections and standards. This bill modifies that language in both the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. It removes the specific, mandated duties the SEC must perform, replacing the proactive language like “Commission shall and all that follows through (1) facilitate” with the less demanding “Commission shall facilitate.” Crucially, it entirely removes a second paragraph of mandated duties (Paragraph 2) from both acts. This isn't just word-trimming; it reduces the SEC’s legal obligation to be aggressive and proactive in setting and enforcing clear, high standards of conduct for firms handling your retirement savings and investments. The result? A less vigorous push for rules that ensure your advisor is truly working for you and not just their commission.

Standards of Conduct Go Missing

Finally, Section 4 repeals a specific subsection (k) in the Securities Exchange Act related to standards of conduct for brokers and dealers. Standards of conduct are the regulatory guardrails that prevent financial professionals from taking advantage of clients. By repealing this specific authority, the bill removes an existing mechanism designed to ensure that those selling you stocks and bonds operate ethically. While the bill doesn’t eliminate all standards, it systematically chips away at the SEC’s toolkit for maintaining a level playing field. For the busy professional or small business owner trying to save for retirement, these changes mean less regulatory muscle is dedicated to making sure the person managing their money is playing by fair rules. This bill is a clear win for financial firms seeking reduced regulatory burdens, but it comes at the cost of diminished protections for the everyday investor.