This Act establishes a grant program to support law enforcement agencies in recruiting diverse candidates through targeted marketing and "Pathways to Policing" training initiatives.
Kelly Morrison
Representative
MN-3
The Pathways to Policing Act establishes the Law Enforcement Hiring Support Grant program to help agencies recruit new officers. This grant money can be used for recruitment campaigns and developing programs that support candidates facing barriers to entering law enforcement. The Act prioritizes funding for agencies seeking to increase diversity and hire candidates connected to the communities they will serve. Additionally, it mandates a national marketing effort to encourage diverse individuals to pursue careers in policing.
The Pathways to Policing Act is essentially a federal funding boost designed to help local police departments find and train new officers, especially those who don't fit the typical mold. Starting in 2026 and running through 2030, the bill authorizes $50 million annually for a new grant program called the Law Enforcement Hiring Support Grant (SEC. 2).
This money is competitive, meaning agencies have to apply for it, and it can be spent in two specific ways: up to 50% for marketing and recruitment campaigns, and the other 50% for developing or expanding "Pathways to Policing" programs. The goal here is pretty clear: staff up departments with officers who better reflect the communities they serve, and help people access the profession even if they lack the traditional background or resources.
If you’ve ever considered a career change into policing but were put off by the cost of training or the time commitment, this bill is specifically targeting you. The "Pathways to Policing programs" are defined as initiatives that provide financial help—like tuition or pay—to candidates who face hurdles getting the necessary education and training (SEC. 2). This is a big deal because it means departments can offer paid training or tuition assistance, effectively removing a major financial barrier for new recruits.
Priority for these grants goes to agencies that are actively recruiting candidates from communities typically underrepresented in policing, or those with "unusual educational or career paths" (SEC. 2). For example, a department might get priority funding if they are recruiting former social workers, veterans without law enforcement experience, or recent high school graduates who couldn't afford a traditional police academy.
Beyond the local grants, the Attorney General is mandated to launch a nationwide marketing and recruitment campaign within one year of the bill passing (SEC. 2). This isn't just a generic “Join the Force” poster campaign; it must specifically target those same underrepresented communities and nontraditional backgrounds. This means that even if your local department doesn't get a grant, you might start seeing federal ads designed to encourage people like you to look into the profession.
While the goal of diversifying the force and creating accessible training pathways is a positive step, it’s worth noting where the bill grants significant power. The COPS Director (part of the Department of Justice) has broad authority to determine what information is required for grant applications and who ultimately receives the funds (SEC. 2). This administrative flexibility is common in competitive grants but means the success of the program hinges heavily on how the Director defines and enforces the priority criteria—specifically, what counts as an "underrepresented community" or an "unusual career path."
Also, while the bill focuses heavily on increasing the number of officers and diversifying the pool, it doesn't include any corresponding provisions related to accountability, oversight, or broader police reform. For taxpayers funding this $50 million annual authorization, the focus is purely on recruitment and training pipeline development. The practical impact is that we will likely see more officers being hired, potentially with more diverse backgrounds, but the rules of engagement for those officers remain outside the scope of this particular legislation.