This Act mandates the SEC to review and update the professional certifications and credentials that qualify an individual as an accredited investor.
Bill Huizenga
Representative
MI-4
The Accredited Investor Definition Review Act updates the criteria for who qualifies as an accredited investor under federal securities law. This bill specifically empowers the SEC to recognize additional professional certifications and credentials as a basis for accredited investor status. Furthermore, it mandates that the SEC periodically review and update this list of recognized credentials to ensure investor protection.
This bill, officially the Accredited Investor Definition Review Act, takes aim at the gatekeeping around private investments. Essentially, it changes who the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) considers an “accredited investor.” This status matters because only accredited investors can participate in many high-risk, high-reward private offerings—the kind of investments that don’t trade on public stock exchanges.
Currently, qualifying as an accredited investor usually means hitting high income or net worth thresholds (think $200,000 in annual income or a $1 million net worth, excluding your primary home). This bill adds a new path: professional credentials. Under Section 2, the SEC must now include individuals who hold specific certifications, designations, or credentials that the Commission deems appropriate. This is a big deal because it recognizes financial knowledge and experience as a legitimate substitute for simply being wealthy.
Crucially, the bill mandates that the SEC automatically include certain professional licenses already recognized under a previous SEC order. For professionals like CPAs, CFAs, or specific licensed brokers, this means a clearer, faster route into private markets, even if their income hasn't yet hit the high thresholds. For example, a sharp financial analyst working for a startup might not make $200k yet, but if they hold a recognized credential, they can now access investments previously reserved for millionaires.
Section 3 puts the SEC on a mandatory review schedule, which is where things get interesting. The Commission must review the list of qualifying credentials within 18 months of the law passing, and then again at least every five years. The goal is to add new credentials that show an equivalent level of financial savvy and experience. This prevents the list from becoming outdated and ensures that new, rigorous professional certifications can also qualify.
However, this periodic review also gives the SEC significant discretion. They can add or adjust the list “in any way that the Commission determines is best for investor protection or generally to serve the public interest.” While this flexibility is meant to keep the system robust, it also means the SEC holds the keys to who gets access. The standard for inclusion is based on whether a credential shows financial knowledge “substantially similar” to existing standards. This vagueness means the SEC’s interpretation will determine how widely the private markets open up.
For the average person, this bill doesn't directly change how they invest in their 401(k) or buy stocks. But it does signal a shift in how regulators view investor sophistication. By expanding the definition based on professional expertise rather than just wealth, the bill is modernizing the rules. The benefit is clear: more sophisticated investors, regardless of their current bank account balance, gain access to potential high-growth opportunities in private companies.
The challenge lies in the risk management. Private investments are inherently riskier, less regulated, and harder to liquidate than public stocks. While the bill intends to only let financially knowledgeable individuals in, the SEC’s ongoing job will be to ensure that the credentials they approve truly reflect the necessary expertise to navigate these complex, high-risk waters. If the SEC is too loose with its approvals, it could lead a broader group of people—albeit credentialed ones—into investments they don't fully understand, potentially increasing their risk exposure.