This Act abolishes FEMA, transfers its functions to the President, and establishes a new, state-focused disaster relief block grant program managed by the Treasury Secretary.
Clay Higgins
Representative
LA-3
The Sovereign States Emergency Management Act abolishes FEMA, transferring its functions to the President within two years. It simultaneously establishes a new Disaster Relief Block Grant Program administered by the Treasury Secretary to provide direct funding to states for preparedness, response, and mitigation efforts. States must submit approved emergency management plans and detailed spending reports to receive and maintain these block grants.
The Sovereign States Emergency Management Act is a major structural overhaul of how the federal government handles natural disasters. Simply put, this bill eliminates the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) entirely two years after the law is signed. On that abolishment date, every single responsibility, piece of equipment, and function currently handled by FEMA’s Administrator gets transferred directly to the President of the United States (SEC. 2).
Alongside this massive transfer of power, the bill creates a temporary Disaster Relief Block Grant Program, administered by the Secretary of the Treasury, not a dedicated emergency agency (SEC. 3). This new program gives states direct funding for preparedness, response, recovery, and mitigation. However, this program isn't permanent; it’s set to end four years after the Treasury Secretary publishes the final funding formula (SEC. 3).
Imagine the federal agency you call after a hurricane or wildfire just... vanishes. That’s what happens here. Every duty—from coordinating national response to managing flood insurance maps—is now the President’s job. Furthermore, any law that mentions the “Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency” or “FEMA” now refers to the Executive Office of the President (SEC. 2).
This move centralizes all national disaster response authority under the White House. For the average person, this means the specialized federal experts and established protocols that FEMA developed over decades are gone, replaced by a structure where disaster relief decisions are funneled through the highest political office. While the bill allows the President to decide when to take over FEMA’s personnel and records, the transfer of responsibility is immediate upon the abolishment date, creating a potential gap in specialized operational management.
The new funding mechanism replaces FEMA’s existing grant structure with a block grant program, giving states more control over how they spend federal disaster dollars (SEC. 3). The Treasury Secretary must develop a formula that considers population, disaster history over the past 20 years, geographic risks, and the state’s economic need (per capita income) (SEC. 3).
For a state with high risk but lower per capita income, like those often hit by tornadoes or coastal storms, this formula could mean a larger slice of the pie. States can use this money for everything from buying new rescue equipment to funding long-term risk reduction projects, though only 5% can go toward their own administrative costs (SEC. 3).
This flexibility comes with serious strings attached. Before a state sees a dime, they must submit an emergency management plan to the Treasury Secretary by April 1st each year. This plan must detail how they will use the grant money, show coordination with local and Tribal governments, and list specific, measurable goals (SEC. 3). If a state fails to meet these planning and reporting requirements, they risk losing access to crucial federal funds, which could leave citizens high and dry after a disaster.
Furthermore, the Secretary must perform an annual audit of the program, and 20% of the total program funding is immediately reserved just for program administration and audit costs (10% each). The biggest catch? The entire block grant program has a four-year expiration date, meaning states cannot rely on this funding structure for long-term planning, introducing massive uncertainty into state-level disaster preparedness just as the specialized federal support vanishes.