PolicyBrief
H.R. 3291
119th CongressMay 8th 2025
Certainty for Our Energy Future Act
IN COMMITTEE

This Act terminates clean energy tax credits for wind and solar projects beginning construction after 2030 and denies clean energy tax benefits to companies connected to designated countries of concern.

Jennifer Kiggans
R

Jennifer Kiggans

Representative

VA-2

LEGISLATION

Clean Energy Tax Credits Face 2030 Sunset for Wind and Solar; Blocks Subsidies for Companies Tied to China, Russia, and Others

The aptly named Certainty for Our Energy Future Act is essentially a two-part tax policy overhaul hitting the clean energy sector. On one hand, it puts a hard expiration date on major tax incentives for wind and solar projects. On the other, it slams the door on companies tied to specific foreign governments getting those same tax breaks.

The 2030 Wind and Solar Deadline

If you’re tracking the renewable energy build-out, this is the big shift. The bill terminates two massive tax breaks—the Clean Electricity Production Credit (Section 45Y) and the Clean Electricity Investment Credit (Section 48E)—for new wind and solar facilities if construction starts after December 31, 2030 (Sections 2 & 3). Right now, these credits are crucial for making large-scale renewable projects financially viable. Developers often use them to secure financing and lower the cost of electricity for consumers.

What this means in plain English: If you’re a utility company or a developer planning a massive new solar farm in 2031, you won't get the federal tax break that your competitor received for breaking ground in 2030. This creates a clear, fixed timeline, pushing the industry to accelerate development over the next few years. The bill locks in existing IRS rules (like those in Notice 2013-29) to define exactly what ‘starting construction’ means, which is smart—it prevents last-minute arguments over whether a project actually qualified before the deadline.

Blocking Foreign Entities from U.S. Subsidies

The second, and perhaps more immediate, change is a major national security move (Section 4). This bill denies a massive list of clean energy tax benefits—everything from electric vehicle refueling property credits (Section 30C) to carbon capture credits (Section 45Q)—to any company deemed a “disqualified company.”

Who is disqualified? Any company created in, or controlled by, a “country of concern.” The bill specifically names the People's Republic of China, the Russian Federation, the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea). The definition of “control” is strict: generally, more than 50% ownership or voting power. This provision is designed to ensure that U.S. taxpayer dollars, distributed through these clean energy subsidies, aren't inadvertently flowing to entities tied to adversarial governments.

For U.S. manufacturers and domestic clean energy businesses, this is a significant change. It essentially locks out foreign competitors from these countries from accessing valuable U.S. incentives, potentially giving domestic companies a leg up. The Treasury Secretary has 180 days after the law passes to issue guidance on how this complex denial process will work, and the rules will take effect shortly after that.

The Real-World Impact on Your Wallet and Grid

This bill creates a fascinating tension. The 2030 sunset for wind and solar credits introduces long-term uncertainty. While eight years might seem like a long time, major energy projects take years of planning. If these credits aren't replaced by a similar incentive structure, it could slow down the rate at which new, large-scale renewable energy comes online after 2030. This could potentially affect future electricity costs and the reliability of the grid, depending on what energy sources step in to fill the gap.

On the other hand, cutting off subsidies to companies linked to countries of concern addresses legitimate supply chain and national security risks. For instance, if you buy a component for your home solar system or an EV charger, this rule aims to ensure that the companies manufacturing those items—if they are receiving U.S. tax benefits—are not controlled by foreign governments that pose a security risk. It’s a move to decouple U.S. clean energy investment from geopolitical rivals, but the complexity of defining and enforcing ‘control’ across global supply chains will be the Treasury Department’s biggest headache.