This bill raises asset thresholds across several key financial regulations, including those governing CFPB supervision, the Volker Rule, qualified mortgages, and capital requirements, from $\$10$ billion to $\$50$ billion.
Garland "Andy" Barr
Representative
KY-6
The Financial Institution Regulatory Tailoring Enhancement Act significantly raises key asset thresholds across several major financial regulations from $\$10$ billion to $\$50$ billion. This change reduces the scope of supervision by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) for many large financial institutions. Furthermore, it adjusts the applicability of the Volker Rule, qualified mortgage definitions, and certain capital requirements.
The Financial Institution Regulatory Tailoring Enhancement Act is making a massive change to who gets regulated in the banking world. Essentially, this bill raises the asset threshold for applying several major financial regulations from $10 billion to a hefty $50 billion. If you’re a mid-sized bank with assets in that $10 billion to $50 billion sweet spot, this bill is like a regulatory spring break.
This isn't just about one rule; it's a sweeping change across several key areas of financial oversight (SEC. 2). The biggest shift involves the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). Right now, the CFPB supervises financial institutions with assets over $10 billion. This bill removes that supervisory authority for institutions between $10 billion and $50 billion. For consumers, the CFPB is often the last line of defense against predatory lending or unfair practices. Removing that direct oversight for a whole class of large, regional banks means a significant chunk of the financial world will now operate without that direct regulatory eye watching their consumer-facing products.
Another major change is to the Volker Rule, which was put in place after the 2008 financial crisis to limit banks' ability to engage in risky proprietary trading—basically, using customer deposits to make speculative bets (SEC. 2, Changes to the Volker Rule). By raising the threshold for Volker Rule applicability from $10 billion to $50 billion, this bill allows those mid-sized banks to potentially re-engage in riskier activities. This is the kind of stuff that can destabilize the financial system if things go south, a concern that directly impacts the general public, who ultimately bear the cost of bailouts or economic downturns.
The bill also adjusts rules around Qualified Mortgages (QM) and capital requirements (SEC. 2). QM rules define safer, more stable loans. By raising the asset threshold for certain QM calculations to $50 billion, the bill changes how these mid-sized lenders structure their mortgages. For someone buying a home, this could mean that mortgages offered by these $10B-$50B institutions might not meet the stricter QM standards, potentially increasing risk for the borrower. Furthermore, these institutions will be exempt from stricter leverage and risk-based capital standards that previously kicked in at the $10 billion mark. Capital requirements are the financial cushion banks must hold to absorb losses; reducing the requirement for a large segment of the banking industry means less cushion if things get rocky.
Think of it this way: You bank at a large regional institution that has $40 billion in assets. Right now, the CFPB is actively supervising that bank to ensure they aren't pulling shady moves with your checking account or mortgage. Under this bill, that direct oversight disappears. The goal of this bill is to reduce the regulatory burden and compliance costs for these mid-sized banks, which they argue will free up capital for lending. However, the cost of this "enhancement" is a significant reduction in consumer protection and systemic stability measures for a class of institutions that are certainly large enough to cause problems if they fail.