This Act restricts law enforcement from using intercepted communications or compelled records containing reproductive or sexual health information to investigate or prosecute individuals seeking or providing related care.
Ted Lieu
Representative
CA-36
The Reproductive Data Privacy and Protection Act restricts law enforcement from using intercepted communications or compelled records that contain reproductive or sexual health information to investigate or prosecute individuals seeking or providing related care. This bill mandates specific sworn statements in wiretap applications and court orders, and in demands for electronic records, affirming that sensitive health details will not be used for such purposes. The Act broadly defines reproductive and sexual health information to ensure comprehensive protection.
The newly proposed Reproductive Data Privacy and Protection Act is a big deal for anyone concerned about digital privacy and health care access. In short, this bill amends federal surveillance law to create a protective barrier around sensitive reproductive and sexual health information, preventing federal law enforcement from using it to launch investigations or prosecutions.
This Act targets two specific areas of federal surveillance: wiretaps (interception of communications) and data requests made to tech companies (like warrants for emails or location data). Currently, federal law enforcement can ask a judge for permission to intercept communications or demand records from providers. This bill adds a critical step to that process. When agents apply for a wiretap or demand records using a subpoena or warrant, they must now provide a sworn statement affirming they won't use any information gathered—specifically about reproductive or sexual health—to investigate or prosecute people seeking, providing, or helping someone access that care. The judge must also include this restriction in the final wiretap order. Think of it as a legal firewall, requiring the government to promise upfront that they won't weaponize your health data.
The most impactful part of this bill is the extremely broad definition of what counts as protected “reproductive or sexual health information.” It’s not just about abortion or IVF. The list covers procedures, prescriptions, and distribution of contraceptives. Crucially, it also includes personal status information, such as details about a person’s pregnancy status, menstruation, ovulation, ability to conceive, and even whether they are sexually active or having unprotected sex. If you are texting a friend about starting a new birth control pill or looking up fertility clinics, this bill aims to ensure those communications can’t be used against you in a federal proceeding related to seeking care.
For most people, this Act provides significant peace of mind in a world where digital data is constantly being collected. If you’re a busy professional who relies on telehealth and messaging apps, this means your private conversations with a doctor or partner about reproductive health decisions are federally shielded from specific kinds of government scrutiny. It means a state or local law enforcement agency, even if they partner with federal agents, can’t easily use federal surveillance tools to bypass state protections for reproductive care.
However, the bill’s broad scope does raise procedural questions for law enforcement. While the intent is clearly to protect health privacy, the wide definition of protected information—including status like ‘sexually active’—could potentially complicate investigations into unrelated crimes if those communications are tangentially linked to reproductive health topics. The law is clear that agents cannot use the data to start an investigation related to seeking or providing care, but the line between a protected communication and evidence for an unrelated crime (say, drug trafficking) might need judicial clarification down the road. Ultimately, this bill is a major step toward cementing digital privacy rights around health care, adding necessary procedural checks to federal surveillance powers.