This bill prohibits Members of Congress and their spouses from trading or owning specified financial instruments while serving in office, with exceptions for pre-existing holdings and blind trusts.
Robert Bresnahan
Representative
PA-8
This bill amends federal law to prohibit Members of Congress and their spouses from trading or owning certain individual stocks and financial instruments while serving in office. It creates exceptions for existing holdings placed in blind trusts, diversified mutual funds, and U.S. Treasury securities. Violations of this trading ban could result in civil penalties.
This legislation is straightforward: it puts a hard stop on Members of Congress and their spouses buying, selling, or holding individual stocks, security futures, or commodities while the Member is serving in office. Essentially, it closes the door on elected officials making personal trades in the markets they are actively regulating and legislating over. The goal is to eliminate the potential for insider trading or conflicts of interest that erode public trust. This is a big change, but it won't actually kick in until the 120th Congress starts.
The bill defines what’s restricted—called a “covered financial instrument”—and it’s mostly individual stocks and complicated derivatives. But here’s the important part for anyone managing a retirement fund: the ban explicitly excludes diversified mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs). It also leaves alone the government’s Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) and standard U.S. Treasury securities. This means Members can still save and invest responsibly, just not in a way that lets them pick individual winners and losers based on non-public information they might gain in their role. If you’re a 40-year-old trying to save for retirement, this bill basically says, “You can still invest broadly, just don’t bet on specific companies.”
If a Member or their spouse already owned a stock portfolio before the Member took office, they aren’t forced to liquidate everything immediately. The bill allows them to keep holding those instruments. This is a practical concession, but it does mean that a Member could still hold a massive, market-sensitive position throughout their entire career, as long as they bought it before they were sworn in. The other out is the “qualified blind trust,” where the Member hands control of their assets over to an independent third party who manages them without the Member’s knowledge. This is the gold standard for separating public duty from private gain.
For most people, the biggest impact of this bill isn't financial—it's about transparency and trust. When officials are making decisions about defense contracts, environmental regulations, or healthcare policy, the public needs to know those decisions aren’t being influenced by a personal stock portfolio. This bill directly addresses that concern. The penalty for violating these new rules is a civil fine, enforced under existing ethics guidelines. While it restricts the investment choices of a few hundred people, the benefit is a clearer ethical boundary for the entire legislative branch, which, in theory, should mean better governance for everyone else.