Reauthorizes and updates the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program, enhancing earthquake preparedness, early warning systems, and resilience through improved coordination, technology, and community engagement.
David Valadao
Representative
CA-22
The National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program Reauthorization Act of 2025 updates and reauthorizes the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program, emphasizing improvements to earthquake early warning systems, incorporating local and Tribal entities in program activities, and enhancing coordination among federal agencies, including the Federal Communications Commission. It also directs the USGS to issue earthquake forecasts for aftershocks and requires the inclusion of natural hazard maps associated with earthquakes. The act allocates specific funding for fiscal years 2026-2030, with a significant portion dedicated to the Advanced National Seismic System.
The National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program Reauthorization Act of 2025 is on the table, aiming to give the nation's earthquake preparedness a significant upgrade. This bill isn't just about renewing an old program; it substantially updates the original Earthquake Hazards Reduction Act of 1977. Key changes include more direct involvement for local and Tribal governments, new requirements for buildings and essential services to speed up community recovery post-quake, and a proposed budget of approximately $83.4 million each year from fiscal year 2026 through 2030 to support these efforts.
So, what's actually changing on the ground if this bill passes? First off, as laid out in SEC. 2, it’s broadening the team involved in earthquake prep. It's not just the federal government calling the shots anymore; local and Tribal entities will be formally woven into planning, designing, constructing, and even retrofitting buildings and infrastructure. Imagine your local city council or Tribal leadership having a direct hand in making sure community centers and schools are up to snuff. The bill also pushes for new standards focused on 'post-earthquake recovery-based performance objectives' and 'functional recovery.' In plain English, that means future building codes and guidelines won't just aim to stop buildings from collapsing. They'll also focus on how quickly you can safely get back into your home or office, and how fast essential 'lifeline infrastructure' – think your water, power, internet, and roads – can be up and running again, at least enough to function. The goal is to minimize downtime and get communities operating again much faster after a quake, as outlined in section 5(a)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii) of the amended Act.
A big piece of this upgrade, also detailed in SEC. 2, is about giving our earthquake early warning systems a serious boost. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) gets the job of expanding the existing system to cover more high-risk areas (section 5(b)(3)(E)). And here’s a key improvement for our diverse communities: these alerts must be broadcast 'rapidly and reliably' in the main languages spoken in affected regions – a big deal for diverse communities (section 5(b)(3)(E)). Think about getting that critical heads-up on your phone, in a language you actually use every day, giving you precious seconds before the shaking starts. To make sure these alerts hit home, the bill mandates better coordination between the USGS and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) (section 5(a)(3)(D)(ii), 5(b)(3)(C)). On top of that, the USGS will start issuing forecasts for aftershocks (section 5(b)(3)(H)) – because the danger often isn't over after the first jolt – and will develop more comprehensive maps showing all earthquake-related natural hazards, like landslides or liquefaction risks, not just the ground shaking (section 5(b)(3)(O)).
This bill recognizes that earthquake preparedness isn't a solo mission. SEC. 2 emphasizes much stronger teamwork between different agencies. For instance, the USGS is directed to work hand-in-glove with NOAA (the folks who track weather and oceans) and FEMA (our national disaster response agency). The idea is to improve data sharing and resource allocation, especially for 'oceanic earthquakes' – those under the sea that have the nasty habit of triggering tsunamis (section 5(b)(3)(D)). This could mean a more streamlined and faster warning if an undersea quake poses a tsunami threat to coastal areas, building on coordination with the National Tsunami Hazards Mitigation Program (section 5(a)(2)(B)(iv)(A)). The bill also formally brings more expertise to the main advisory group by adding representatives from Tribal governments and the Chair of the Scientific Earthquake Studies Advisory Committee (section 5(a)(5)(A)), ensuring a wider range of voices and knowledge shapes our national earthquake strategy.
Okay, so how are we paying for all this? SEC. 3 of the bill lays out the financial commitment: it amends subsection 12(b)(2) of the Earthquake Hazards Reduction Act of 1977 (42 U.S.C. 7706(b)(2)) to authorize $83,403,000 for each fiscal year from 2026 right through 2030 for the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program. This provides a predictable funding stream to get these upgrades off the ground and keep them running. A significant slice of that annual pie – at least $30 million – is specifically earmarked to complete and enhance the 'Advanced National Seismic System' established under section 13 of the original Act. This system is the high-tech backbone of how we monitor earthquakes and collect crucial data. Investing here means better science, which ultimately translates to smarter building practices, more effective preparedness, and faster, more reliable warnings for everyone living in earthquake-prone zones.