Extends various biofuel tax credits through 2026, while ensuring no double benefits are claimed for fuels also receiving credit under the clean fuel production credit.
Mike Carey
Representative
OH-15
The "Biodiesel Tax Credit Extension Act of 2025" extends key biofuel tax incentives through 2026, promoting the production and use of biodiesel, renewable diesel, and second-generation biofuels. This extension aims to support the biofuel industry by continuing tax credits for biodiesel and renewable diesel mixtures, as well as alcohol fuel. The act also ensures that no double benefits are claimed for fuel receiving credit under other sections of the law. These amendments are effective for fuel sold or used after December 31, 2024, and for qualified second-generation biofuel production occurring after the same date.
This bill, the "Biodiesel Tax Credit Extension Act of 2025," essentially hits the snooze button on the expiration date for several key tax breaks aimed at the biofuel industry. It pushes the deadlines for credits related to biodiesel, renewable diesel, and second-generation biofuels out to the end of 2026, with one specific second-generation biofuel credit extending to January 1, 2027. The main goal, as laid out in Section 2, is to continue encouraging the production and use of these alternative fuels by amending the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, with these changes kicking in for fuel sold or used after December 31, 2024.
So, what exactly is getting extended? If you're in the business of making or blending biodiesel or renewable diesel, this bill offers a couple more years of tax relief. Specifically, the credit under Section 40A(g) for producing these fuels, and the credit under Section 6426(c)(6) for mixing biodiesel with conventional fuel, are both now set to run through 2026. This also applies if you're using these fuels in ways that aren't typically taxed—like in certain farm equipment or for heating oil—as that credit under Section 6427(e)(6)(B) also gets the extension to 2026. For instance, a local delivery company that uses a biodiesel blend in its trucks could continue to see reduced fuel costs thanks to these extended credits, or a construction business using renewable diesel in its heavy machinery might find it more economical.
A key detail in this extension is the bill's effort to prevent what's often called "double-dipping" on tax incentives. The legislation makes it clear that companies can't claim these extended biofuel credits and also grab benefits from the newer clean fuel production credit under Section 45Z(a) for the same batch of fuel. This coordination is crucial. It applies to the biodiesel and renewable diesel credits, as well as the alcohol fuel credit for "second-generation biofuel production" – think fuels made from agricultural waste or woody biomass, not just traditional corn ethanol. This particular credit for advanced biofuels, found in Section 40(b)(7)(J)(i) of the tax code, is extended until January 1, 2027, but again, producers must choose it or the Section 45Z(a) credit, not both. This means a biofuel refinery will need to run the numbers to see which credit provides the better financial outcome for them.
These extensions are designed to give the U.S. biofuels industry a continued leg up, providing financial incentives that help renewable fuels compete with traditional fossil fuels. This can be a positive for folks interested in energy independence and potentially for businesses aiming to lower their carbon footprint. However, it's important to remember that tax credits aren't magic money; they represent revenue the government doesn't collect, which means the cost is ultimately distributed among all taxpayers. The bill itself is pretty clear (what we'd call low vagueness) about its intentions: keep existing biofuel incentives going while adding rules to prevent gaming the system. The real-world effect is a continued government push for biofuels, prompting ongoing discussions about the most effective and fair ways to support renewable energy development and who ultimately benefits versus who pays.