The Rural Patient Monitoring Access Act establishes a minimum payment floor for rural remote patient monitoring services and sets new quality and reporting requirements for Medicare reimbursement starting in 2026.
David Kustoff
Representative
TN-8
The Rural Patient Monitoring Access Act aims to improve access to remote patient monitoring (RPM) for rural Medicare beneficiaries. It establishes a minimum payment floor for the geographic indices used to calculate practice expense and malpractice costs for RPM services starting in 2026. Furthermore, the bill sets new quality requirements for RPM providers to qualify for Medicare payment, including real-time clinical availability and data interoperability. Finally, it mandates a future report analyzing the actual cost savings generated by these enhanced RPM services.
The Rural Patient Monitoring Access Act, or RPM Access Act, is designed to fix a specific problem in how Medicare pays for remote patient monitoring (RPM)—the systems that let doctors track your blood pressure or glucose levels from afar. Starting January 1, 2026, this bill sets a minimum payment floor for healthcare providers offering these services, especially in rural areas where access to care is often limited.
Congress noticed something interesting: three out of five areas needing more health professionals are rural, meaning those folks have to drive way farther to see a doctor. But here’s the kicker—Medicare payments for RPM services are actually the lowest in the very states that have the highest rates of chronic conditions like heart failure and diabetes (Sec. 2). Essentially, providers in these high-need, rural spots were getting paid less to deliver care that is demonstrably helping patients and saving Medicare money in the long run.
The core fix is in Section 3, which deals with how Medicare calculates payments. Those payments are adjusted based on where the provider is located, using geographic indices for practice expenses (like rent and staff) and malpractice insurance. If these indices fall below 1.00, the bill requires the Secretary to immediately bump them up to 1.00 for RPM services. Think of 1.00 as the baseline payment rate. This change ensures that geographical adjustments can’t drag the payment rate down below that baseline, which should make it more financially viable for rural clinics and hospitals to offer these high-tech monitoring services. Crucially, this increase is not budget-neutral, meaning the extra cost to Medicare won’t be offset by cuts elsewhere in the system. This is a direct investment in rural RPM.
While the bill helps providers get paid fairly, it also raises the bar on the quality of RPM services starting in 2026 (Sec. 4). To get Medicare reimbursement, providers must meet new standards. First, they have to ensure a doctor, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant is available in real time to respond if the monitoring system detects an unusual health sign—a “physiologic anomaly.” This is a big deal; it means if your heart rate spikes at 2 AM, someone qualified needs to be ready to jump in, not just review the data the next morning. Second, the system must be able to share your health data with electronic health records (EHRs) when needed, making sure your care is coordinated across different systems. For patients, this means the RPM services you receive should be more responsive and integrated into your overall care plan.
Finally, the RPM Access Act requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to send a comprehensive report to Congress within five years. This report must analyze the four years following the start of the new rules (2026–2030) and answer the million-dollar question: How much money did Medicare actually save because of RPM? They need to look at savings from fewer hospital days and better medication adherence, and weigh those against the practice expenses for providing the monitoring (Sec. 4). This part is critical because it moves beyond assumptions and provides concrete data on whether this specific investment in rural healthcare is paying off for taxpayers and beneficiaries alike.