This bill adjusts Social Security benefit amounts by applying a locality-based cost-of-living adjustment derived from federal employee locality pay rates.
Grace Meng
Representative
NY-6
The Locality-based Social Security Benefits Act of 2025 adjusts Social Security benefits to reflect the local cost of living. This bill mandates that the Commissioner of Social Security increase monthly payments based on the same locality pay percentages used for federal employees. This creates a localized cost-of-living adjustment on top of the standard benefit amount.
The Locality-based Social Security Benefits Act of 2025 proposes a major change to how your Social Security check is calculated, aiming to make benefits better reflect where you actually live. Currently, the cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) is national, meaning a retiree in Manhattan gets the same COLA percentage as one in rural Mississippi, even though their housing and grocery costs are wildly different. This bill, however, is designed to fix that.
This legislation introduces a locality adjustment on top of the standard monthly Social Security payment. The key mechanism here is that the percentage increase won't be invented from scratch. Instead, the Commissioner of Social Security must use the exact same percentage rates that the President sets for federal employee locality pay areas. Think of it this way: if federal workers in your metro area get a 20% locality boost because the cost of living is high there, this bill would apply that same 20% boost to your monthly Social Security benefit.
The bill’s genius—and potential complexity—lies in its reliance on an existing, standardized federal system (sections 5304 and 5304a of title 5, United States Code). This means the Social Security Administration doesn't need to create a whole new map of high-cost areas; they just adopt the one already in use for federal employees, which is reviewed and updated regularly. For a retiree living in a high-cost urban area, this could mean a significant, immediate bump in monthly income, making it easier to cover rising rents and property taxes. For example, if you live in a region designated as a high-cost area for federal workers, your benefit check would see a substantial increase designed to match those elevated expenses.
Recipients in high-cost metro areas are the clear winners here, as their benefits would finally reflect the real expense of living there. However, this change isn't without trade-offs. First, it places a significant, unquantified financial burden on the Social Security Trust Fund, as benefit payouts will increase substantially. Second, while no one loses money, recipients in areas with lower (or no) locality adjustments might see their purchasing power fall relative to those in high-cost areas. The bill essentially delegates a huge piece of Social Security benefit calculation to the executive branch’s process for setting federal worker pay, linking your retirement security to the political and economic decisions made around civil service compensation. While the intent is to make benefits fairer, the cost to the Trust Fund and the reliance on an external system are the details busy people need to watch.