PolicyBrief
H.R. 3073
119th CongressApr 29th 2025
Shivwits Band of Paiutes Jurisdictional Clarity Act
IN COMMITTEE

This Act clarifies jurisdictional authority for civil lawsuits and federal court access concerning contracts involving the Shivwits Band of Paiutes while preserving the Tribe's sovereign immunity and expanding its land leasing authority.

Celeste Maloy
R

Celeste Maloy

Representative

UT-2

LEGISLATION

New Act Clarifies Legal Jurisdiction for Shivwits Paiutes, Expands Tribal Land Leasing Authority

This legislation, officially titled the Shivwits Band of Paiutes Jurisdictional Clarity Act, is all about drawing clearer lines on who has legal authority—state or federal courts—when the Shivwits Band of Paiutes in Utah is involved. Essentially, it defines the legal playing field for the Tribe, particularly concerning contracts, leases, and civil disputes on their land, while also giving them more control over managing their assets.

Where Do Disputes Go? The Court Split

For anyone who deals with the Tribe, knowing which courthouse to go to is the biggest takeaway. The Act creates a split jurisdiction, which is common but needs clarification here.

First, Section 3 grants Utah state courts the authority to handle civil lawsuits—think personal injury claims or non-contract disputes—as long as the incident happened on the designated “Indian lands” (land held in trust or restricted by the U.S. government). So, if there’s a fender bender on a tribal road, a Utah state court can hear the civil case. This provides a clear, local venue for these types of disputes.

Second, Section 4 pushes disputes arising from contracts and leases directly into federal court. It explicitly says that any contract or lease involving the Tribe or their lands is automatically treated as federal commerce. This means if a construction company signs a lease with the Tribe to build a new facility and a dispute arises over the terms, that lawsuit is considered a civil case arising under federal law. This ensures that major commercial dealings involving tribal land are adjudicated under federal standards, potentially offering more predictability for businesses looking to invest or partner with the Tribe.

Tribal Sovereignty Remains Untouched

For those worried about the Tribe’s legal standing, Section 5 is the important piece: it explicitly preserves the Tribe’s sovereign immunity. Even with Utah courts gaining some civil jurisdiction and federal courts gaining contract jurisdiction, the Shivwits Band still retains the right to refuse to be sued without their express permission. This is a fundamental protection of tribal sovereignty and ensures that while the courts may be clarified, the Tribe’s legal autonomy is not diminished.

More Power Over Land Management

Perhaps the biggest economic change is found in Section 6, which expands the Tribe’s leasing authority. The Act amends existing federal law (25 U.S.C. 415(a)) to add the Shivwits Band of Paiutes to the list of tribes that can lease their trust lands under those provisions. This essentially gives the Tribe the same authority as many other federally recognized tribes to manage, negotiate, and execute leases on their lands held in trust by the U.S. government. For the Tribe, this means more direct control and potentially faster, more streamlined processes for economic development projects, whether they involve commercial ventures, housing, or other long-term uses of their land.