This bill mandates that the Directors of the D.C. Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency and the Pretrial Services Agency must reside in the District of Columbia.
Eleanor Norton
Representative
DC
This bill mandates that the Directors of the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency (CSOSA) and the Pretrial Services Agency must be residents of the District of Columbia. This new requirement applies only to individuals appointed to these positions after the bill is enacted into law. The legislation ensures that the heads of these key D.C. agencies live within the District they serve.
This legislation tightens the employment requirements for two major players in the District of Columbia’s justice system: the Director of the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency (CSOSA) and the Director of the Pretrial Services Agency. In short, the bill mandates that anyone appointed to lead either of these agencies must live in the District of Columbia itself.
These aren’t just bureaucratic jobs; CSOSA handles supervision for thousands of offenders on probation, parole, and supervised release, while the Pretrial Services Agency manages defendants awaiting trial. Both agencies are deeply involved in the day-to-day realities of D.C. neighborhoods and public safety. The thinking here, laid out in Section 1, is that requiring the directors to be D.C. residents ensures they have skin in the game—they live in the community they are responsible for protecting and serving. It’s an effort to increase local accountability by making sure the person calling the shots is directly impacted by the outcomes.
Crucially, this new residency rule only applies to future appointees. If the current Director of CSOSA, for example, lives in Virginia, they won’t be forced to move or step down. The requirement kicks in only for the next person appointed to the role after this bill becomes law. This setup avoids disrupting current leadership but establishes a clear mandate for the long run.
For D.C. residents, this change is designed to ensure that the leadership of these vital public safety agencies is deeply connected to the city’s specific challenges—from housing costs to neighborhood crime patterns. However, the practical challenge is narrowing the talent pool. By requiring D.C. residency, the bill automatically disqualifies highly qualified candidates who might live just across the river in Maryland or Virginia. While local knowledge is valuable, the pool of candidates available to lead these complex, high-stakes federal agencies is now smaller, potentially making the search for top-tier talent more challenging.