This act prohibits federal funding for colleges and universities that mandate COVID-19 vaccinations for students or employees.
Mark Messmer
Representative
IN-8
The No Vaccine Mandates in Higher Education Act prohibits the federal government from providing funds to colleges and universities that require students or employees to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. This measure ensures that institutions of higher education cannot mandate vaccination for enrollment, employment, or access to services without risking the loss of federal funding.
The “No Vaccine Mandates in Higher Education Act” is short, direct, and packs a massive punch. If passed, this bill would block the federal government from sending any money to colleges and universities that require students, staff, or contractors to get the COVID-19 vaccine. Think of this as a financial ultimatum: either drop the mandate or lose access to critical federal funding streams, including student aid, research grants, and institutional support. The bill targets any institution of higher education (as defined by the Higher Education Act of 1965) that makes the vaccine a requirement for enrollment, employment, or accessing any school service or benefit (SEC. 2).
For many colleges, federal funding is the lifeblood—it keeps the lights on, pays professors, and, crucially, processes federal student loans and Pell Grants. By linking vaccine mandates to this funding, the bill effectively strips institutions of their autonomy in setting campus health policies. It forces them into a difficult choice: maintain a mandate they believe is necessary for public health, or sacrifice potentially billions in federal dollars. For a large state university, losing this funding could mean immediate cuts to academic programs or a massive hike in tuition, which would hit middle-class families hard.
If you’re a student, the immediate effect is clear: your school cannot require you to get the COVID-19 vaccine. This is a win for personal medical choice, but it comes with a major potential trade-off. For students and staff who are immunocompromised or otherwise vulnerable, the removal of a vaccine mandate could make campus life feel significantly riskier. Institutions that currently rely on mandates to keep large, crowded lecture halls and dorms safer would have to pivot to less restrictive, and potentially less effective, public health measures. The bill focuses only on COVID-19 mandates, leaving other required vaccines (like MMR or Meningitis) untouched.
The mechanism of enforcement here is extreme. The bill doesn't propose a small fine or a temporary reduction in a specific grant; it threatens the complete withdrawal of all federal funds (SEC. 2). This massive financial penalty could destabilize institutions that choose to prioritize a vaccine mandate, potentially leading to financial collapse for smaller schools or severe service reductions for larger ones. It’s a classic example of using a nuclear option—cutting off the entire funding supply—to enforce a change in a single policy. While the intent may be to protect individual liberty, the collateral damage to institutional stability and the resulting impact on tuition costs and student services could be significant.