The Protecting America’s Workers Act aims to strengthen workplace safety by expanding protections for public employees and whistleblowers, increasing employer accountability, and enhancing state and federal oversight.
Joe Courtney
Representative
CT-2
**Protecting America’s Workers Act Summary:** This bill aims to strengthen workplace safety and health protections by expanding coverage to public employees, increasing whistleblower protections, improving reporting and enforcement, and enhancing state plan oversight. It broadens employer responsibilities, updates safety standards, and increases penalties for violations, while also ensuring victims' rights are protected. The Act also enhances the role of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) in evaluating workplace hazards and expanding training resources. Finally, it establishes a clear timeline for the implementation of these provisions across different jurisdictions.
The "Protecting America’s Workers Act" proposes a significant overhaul of federal workplace safety laws, primarily by amending the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. Key changes include extending OSHA protections to an estimated 22 million public sector employees, significantly increasing civil and criminal penalties for safety violations—with fines up to $700,000 for certain offenses and potential imprisonment for up to 20 years for repeat offenses leading to death—and enhancing whistleblower protections for employees reporting unsafe conditions. The bill aims to broaden the scope of workplace safety regulations, strengthen enforcement mechanisms, and provide greater recourse for workers and their families affected by workplace incidents.
First off, this bill widens OSHA's reach. Under SEC. 101, federal, state, and local government employees would finally get the same OSHA protections as private-sector workers. This is a big deal for folks in public works, schools, and other government jobs who haven't had federal OSHA looking out for them. The bill also formally defines an "authorized employee representative" (SEC. 102) as anyone an employee picks to represent them, potentially including union reps or other advocates, which could change who gets to be involved in safety discussions and inspections. A notable provision in SEC. 103 allows the Secretary of Labor to hand off safety oversight to another federal agency if their rules are deemed "as effective" as OSHA's. While there's a process for public input and judicial review, it does raise questions about whether safety standards could vary if another agency takes the reins, even with the best intentions.
If you see something, say something – and this bill wants to make that safer. Title II (SEC. 201) seriously beefs up whistleblower protections. Employees who report injuries, illnesses, or unsafe conditions, or even refuse to do work they reasonably believe could cause serious harm (after trying to notify their employer, if practical), would get stronger shields against retaliation. The timeline to file a retaliation complaint with the Secretary of Labor is extended to 180 days. If the investigation finds reasonable cause, remedies can include reinstatement, back pay, compensatory and even exemplary damages, and importantly, the employer could be on the hook for the employee's attorney fees. This could empower more workers to speak out, but the process for resolution, involving investigations, hearings, and potential court action, will still require time and persistence.
Employers, listen up: your general duty to provide a safe workplace is getting more specific. SEC. 301 clarifies that this duty extends to hazards employers create or control, and to any person performing work there, not just direct employees. Crucially, each employee exposed to a hazard could count as a separate violation, potentially multiplying penalties. Additionally, SEC. 302 mandates that OSHA update national consensus standards within two years, unless they've been replaced or an update wouldn't improve safety, aiming to keep safety rules from getting stale.
Reporting and transparency are also getting an upgrade. SEC. 312 requires employers to promptly report any work-related death, or an injury or illness leading to in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye. It also explicitly prohibits policies that discourage accurate reporting. Larger employers in certain high-hazard industries will need to electronically submit detailed annual injury and illness logs, which will be made publicly searchable. A new requirement for "site-controlling employers" (like a general contractor on a multi-employer site) is to maintain a site log of all recordable injuries and illnesses for everyone working there. And if OSHA comes knocking, SEC. 313 makes it clear: employees participating in inspections must be paid for their time. Furthermore, SEC. 314 mandates OSHA investigations for all workplace fatalities and "significant incidents" (defined as causing in-patient hospitalization of two or more employees).
If violations occur, the consequences are set to become much steeper. SEC. 351 dramatically increases civil penalties. For example, the maximum for willful or repeated violations jumps from $70,000 to $700,000. Other serious violations could see penalties rise from $7,000 to $70,000. These penalties will also be adjusted annually for inflation. This is a significant financial stick intended to grab employers' attention, though it could pose a substantial burden, especially for smaller businesses that might struggle with such hefty fines even for unintentional lapses.
Criminal penalties are also getting tougher under SEC. 352. If a willful violation leads to an employee's death, an employer (defined to include officers and directors) could face fines and imprisonment of up to 10 years (20 for repeat offenses). New criminal penalties are introduced for violations causing "serious bodily harm" (defined as involving substantial risk of death, unconsciousness, disfigurement, or loss/impairment of a bodily function), with up to 5 years imprisonment (10 for repeats). While the definition aims for clarity, how "serious bodily harm" is interpreted in practice could lead to some variability. Giving advance notice of an inspection or falsifying documents would also carry potential prison time of up to 5 years. To ensure penalties aren't delayed, SEC. 353 adds prejudgment interest on contested penalties.
For those directly impacted by workplace tragedies, Title III, Part D (SEC. 331) introduces new rights. Victims (employees injured or ill due to a workplace incident, or their family members if the employee dies or is incapacitated) or their representatives will have the right to meet with OSHA before a citation decision, receive copies of citations, be informed of and participate in proceedings, and make statements. OSHA area offices will also designate family liaisons to support victims through the process. This aims to give a stronger voice to those most affected by workplace safety failures.
This Act also tweaks how OSHA enforces its rules. SEC. 342 specifies that for serious, willful, or repeated violations, the clock to fix the problem starts when the citation is received, and contesting it doesn't automatically pause this correction period. Employers can seek a stay, but only if they show a high likelihood of winning their contest and that the stay won't harm worker safety. If the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission is short-staffed and can't issue a final decision within a year, the administrative law judge's decision becomes final (SEC. 343), potentially speeding up resolutions.
States with their own OSHA-approved safety plans aren't off the hook. SEC. 401 allows federal OSHA to step in with concurrent enforcement if a state plan is found to be failing and doesn't fix deficiencies promptly. The Comptroller General will also conduct regular reviews of these state plans. Furthermore, SEC. 402 requires state plans to consider an employer's violation history across all jurisdictions (federal and other states) when determining if a violation is a repeated offense, aiming for more consistency. This could mean companies with poor safety records in one state can't easily escape that history in another.
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) also gets an expanded role. SEC. 501 clarifies NIOSH's duty to conduct health hazard evaluations upon request from employers or employee reps to determine if workplace substances are toxic or hazardous. SEC. 502 authorizes grant programs for nonprofits to train employers and employees on recognizing and preventing unsafe conditions and understanding their rights and responsibilities.
So, when would all this take effect? According to SEC. 601, most provisions of the Act would kick in 90 days after it's enacted. However, there are a couple of key exceptions. States with their own OSHA plans will generally have 12 months to bring their plans into compliance, with a possible 12-month extension if their legislature isn't in session. For workplaces in states or areas that don't have an approved state plan (where federal OSHA has direct jurisdiction for public employees currently not covered), the changes for those newly covered public employees would take effect 36 months after enactment. This phased approach acknowledges the time needed for states and agencies to adapt to these wide-ranging new requirements.