This Act mandates that the Small Business Administration must ensure its rulemaking imposes zero net cost on small businesses starting in fiscal year 2026 and requires annual reporting on the regulatory costs imposed by other federal agencies on small businesses.
Beth Van Duyne
Representative
TX-24
The Small Business Regulatory Reduction Act of 2025 mandates that the Small Business Administration (SBA) must ensure its new rules impose zero net cost on small businesses starting in fiscal year 2026. The Act requires the SBA's Office of Advocacy to annually report to Congress on the total regulatory costs imposed on small businesses by *other* federal agencies. This legislation is designed to reduce the financial burden of federal rulemaking on small businesses without authorizing any new appropriations.
The Small Business Regulatory Reduction Act of 2025 is designed to put the brakes on new costs hitting small businesses from federal regulations, specifically those coming from the Small Business Administration (SBA). Starting in fiscal year 2026, the SBA Administrator must ensure that the total financial cost of all new rules—what the bill calls the “small business regulatory budget”—is zero or less. In plain English, the SBA can’t issue any new regulation, no matter how helpful or necessary, if it costs small businesses a dime to comply.
Section 2 of this Act is the core of the change, effectively imposing a regulatory freeze on the SBA. For anyone running a small business—whether it’s a local bakery or a tech startup—this sounds great. It means no new paperwork, no new compliance costs, and no new mandates coming from the SBA that eat into your profit margin or your time. For example, if the SBA wanted to implement a new rule requiring better data security protocols for small businesses that handle sensitive loan application data, and that rule cost $500 per business to implement, this bill would block it entirely. While the goal is to ease the burden on entrepreneurs, the practical effect is that it handcuffs the SBA, preventing it from updating or creating rules that might offer protection or clarity, even if those rules would ultimately benefit the public or the small businesses themselves.
Beyond stopping the SBA from creating costly rules, the bill also piles a significant new reporting duty onto the SBA’s Office of Advocacy. This office is already tasked with being the voice of small businesses within the government. Under this Act, the Chief Counsel of the Office of Advocacy must now send an annual report to Congress detailing the total regulatory costs imposed on small businesses by every other federal agency—not just the SBA. They have to list every rule that caused those costs and break down the totals by agency. Think of it as a massive, mandatory annual audit of the entire federal regulatory system, all focused on the cost to small businesses. For the busy staff at the Office of Advocacy, this is a huge, new administrative lift that requires tracking and calculating compliance costs across the entire government.
Here’s the catch: Section 3 explicitly states that Congress is authorizing “No additional funds” to carry out this entire Act. The staff at the Office of Advocacy, who are now required to produce this comprehensive, government-wide cost report, have to do it using their existing budget. This means resources currently used for other advocacy work—like helping small businesses navigate existing regulations or fighting for their interests in specific policy debates—will likely be diverted to fund this new, extensive reporting requirement. For business owners relying on the SBA for guidance or support, this could mean fewer resources are available for their direct needs, as the agency shifts focus to compliance with this new law.
This bill sets up a clear trade-off. On one hand, it guarantees that small businesses won't face new financial burdens from SBA rules, which is a definite win for the bottom line. On the other hand, by setting the regulatory budget at an absolute zero, it effectively kills the SBA’s ability to proactively address emerging issues—like new safety standards, consumer protection measures, or updated lending requirements—if those solutions require any new investment from the business owner. The public could lose out on necessary protections, and the SBA's ability to evolve with the economy is severely limited. While the transparency provided by the new reporting requirement is valuable, the fact that it’s an unfunded mandate means the cost of tracking the regulations might end up being paid for by reducing other, more direct services to small businesses.