PolicyBrief
H.R. 2957
119th CongressApr 17th 2025
Services and Trauma-informed Research of Outcomes in Neighborhoods Grants for Support for Children Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

The "STRONG Support for Children Act of 2025" aims to prevent and mitigate childhood trauma by establishing grant programs for data analysis, strategy implementation, and trauma-informed care coordination services, particularly for children aged 0-5 and their caregivers.

Ayanna Pressley
D

Ayanna Pressley

Representative

MA-7

LEGISLATION

Breaking Down the STRONG Act: How New Grants Could Tackle Childhood Trauma

The "Services and Trauma-informed Research of Outcomes in Neighborhoods Grants for Support for Children Act of 2025," or STRONG Support for Children Act for short, is looking to tackle childhood trauma head-on. It proposes setting up two new grant programs under the Public Health Service Act. The big idea? To pour resources into understanding, preventing, and lessening the impact of tough childhood experiences, aiming to give kids a better shot and strengthen family and community support systems.

Show Me the Data: Grants for Smarter Prevention

First up, the bill wants to get smarter about how we prevent and deal with what are known as 'adverse childhood experiences' (ACEs) – those really tough events that can cast a long shadow. It's proposing a grant program, potentially up to $9.5 million per project over 7 years for up to five chosen organizations, to really dig into data and roll out effective strategies. Think of it like this: communities could get funds to pinpoint exactly where kids are most at risk and what kind of support, like outreach programs or better care coordination, would actually make a difference. A key detail from the fine print in Section 2 is that at least 25% of these grant funds must go to smaller, on-the-ground organizations helping implement these strategies. There are also important guardrails: this data analysis can't be used to make decisions about individual kids, force anyone into services, or get more law enforcement involved. And they’re serious about making sure these services are available to everyone, no matter their ability to pay, immigration status, or background. The total pot for these grants and their evaluation is pegged at $47.5 million for the grants and $7.5 million for evaluations, slated for fiscal years 2025 through 2032.

Boots on the Ground: Connecting Our Youngest to Care

The second part of this bill, detailed in Section 3, zooms in on the little ones – kids aged 0 to 5 and their caregivers, including those expecting. It’s setting up grants for local governments and Indian Tribes to provide trauma-informed care coordination. We're talking about $250,000 to $1 million per year for each grantee, with the goal of funding between 9 and 40 such programs. Priority goes to communities facing the toughest challenges – think high rates of community violence, limited access to prenatal care, or significant numbers of low-income children. The idea is to build a system where families can easily get connected to the help they need, using strengths-based approaches to assess risks and needs. This could mean hiring more care coordinators, investing in telemedicine to reach more families, or simply making sure there's a central place to find out about available services. Again, these services must be accessible, and the data collected can't be used to penalize anyone. This part of the program is looking at $15 million authorized each year for five years.

The Real-World Ripple Effect: Stronger Kids, Stronger Communities

So, what’s the big picture here if this bill moves forward? The STRONG Support for Children Act is essentially trying to build a more supportive net for kids and families, especially those dealing with the heavy weight of trauma. By funding both smart data analysis and direct care coordination, the aim is to get ahead of problems before they escalate and ensure help is there when it's needed. The bill repeatedly emphasizes that services must be accessible to everyone, regardless of their situation, and includes clear rules – like those in Section 2(e)(9) and Section 3 (adding 1255(f)) – against using information to punish or exclude. For instance, data can't be used for "individual case decisions" or to "increase law enforcement involvement." This is about understanding community-wide patterns to improve systems, not targeting individuals. If it works as planned, this could mean healthier development for kids, less strain on families, and ultimately, stronger, more resilient communities. It’s a significant investment, and the built-in evaluations will be key to seeing if these strategies truly hit the mark.