PolicyBrief
H.R. 2934
119th CongressApr 17th 2025
STATES 2.0 Act
IN COMMITTEE

The STATES 2.0 Act amends the Controlled Substances Act to generally exempt state-legal and tribal-legal marijuana activities from federal marijuana laws, while tasking the FDA with regulating marijuana products and requiring a study on the impact of marijuana legalization on traffic safety.

David Joyce
R

David Joyce

Representative

OH-14

LEGISLATION

STATES 2.0 Act Proposes Federal Backseat on Marijuana, Puts States and FDA in Charge

The STATES 2.0 Act is looking to fundamentally change the federal government's stance on marijuana, essentially stepping back where states or tribes have stepped in. This bill proposes that federal marijuana laws under the Controlled Substances Act generally won't apply to producing, possessing, or selling cannabis if it's done according to state or federally recognized tribal law (within states that allow it). The goal is to sync up conflicting federal and state approaches and create a clearer regulatory path.

Clearing the Haze: State vs. Federal Rules

Right now, cannabis businesses operating legally under state law still technically violate federal law, creating a messy legal gray area. Section 4 of this bill aims to fix that. If a state or tribe has legalized marijuana and an activity complies with their rules, the feds would largely stay out of it. This could mean less uncertainty for licensed dispensaries, growers, and consumers in legal states. The bill also explicitly includes tribal governments, recognizing their authority to regulate cannabis on their lands, provided the state they're in also permits it. However, the feds aren't completely hands-off; certain federal laws, like those preventing distribution near schools (Section 418, though the bill exempts compliant medicinal distribution to those 18+) or operating while impaired (Section 409), could still apply under specific circumstances mentioned in the bill.

Green Light for Green Lanes: Interstate Commerce & Tracking

Ever wonder how cannabis products might legally move between states like Colorado and California? Section 4 addresses this too. The bill generally prevents states or tribes from blocking marijuana shipments passing through their territory if both the starting point and destination allow cannabis activities. It also aims to protect individuals involved in transporting marijuana between two legal jurisdictions from federal prosecution. While states can still impose "reasonable restrictions" (think time, place, manner rules), the idea is to allow legal interstate commerce. To prevent diversion into illegal markets, the bill anticipates federal oversight and tracking of these interstate shipments, though the specifics of that system aren't detailed here.

FDA Steps In: What's in Your Weed?

If this passes, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) gets a major new job regulating marijuana products intended for consumption (Section 7). How a product is regulated depends on what it is: marijuana classified as a "drug" faces standard drug rules, while food or dietary supplements containing marijuana would be regulated like food containing alcohol. Cosmetics get cosmetic rules. For everything else – think vape pens, certain edibles, etc. – the FDA has 180 days to create new rules covering contaminant testing, manufacturing standards, and marketing practices, specifically aiming to prevent youth use. Notably, these 'other' products wouldn't need premarket approval. Also, mixing marijuana products with alcohol, tobacco, or other drugs is a no-go under this bill.

The Bottom Line: Taxes, Business Relief, and Safety Studies

The bill acknowledges a big problem: high taxes on legal weed often make it pricier than illegal stuff (Section 2). While it doesn't set specific tax rates, it suggests a federal excise tax should be low enough to help legal businesses compete and should fund regulatory costs like testing, enforcement, and prevention programs. Crucially for businesses, Section 9 would repeal the dreaded Section 280E of the tax code for compliant marijuana operations. This means state-legal cannabis businesses could finally deduct normal business expenses (rent, payroll, etc.) like any other industry, potentially lowering their effective tax rate significantly. The bill also provides legal shields, stating compliant activities aren't federal drug trafficking or grounds for asset forfeiture. Finally, to understand the real-world safety impact, Section 8 requires a government study on how marijuana legalization affects traffic safety.