This bill strengthens federal oversight, financial accountability, and transparency for educational institutions receiving federal student aid to protect students from risky operations and misrepresentation.
Mark Takano
Representative
CA-39
The **Preventing Risky Operations from Threatening the Education and Career Trajectories of Students Act of 2025** aims to strengthen federal oversight and accountability for institutions receiving federal student aid. It establishes new financial performance standards, expands student protections against deceptive practices and school closures, and mandates greater transparency regarding institutional spending and student outcomes. Ultimately, the bill seeks to ensure that federal aid supports quality education that leads to financial success for students while penalizing low-performing or fraudulent institutions.
The PROTECT Students Act of 2025 is a massive overhaul of federal student aid rules designed to put the brakes on schools that overcharge students and underdeliver on career outcomes. This bill is essentially the government giving colleges a strict financial report card and telling them: show us the value, or lose access to federal student loan money.
This legislation tackles three core problems: programs that leave students with debt but no job prospects, schools that mislead students, and institutions that prioritize marketing and executive pay over actual teaching. It does this by creating hard financial metrics for program success, strengthening consumer protection mechanisms, and mandating institutional spending floors on instruction.
For years, schools have offered programs that load up students with debt but don't pay off in the job market. This bill (SEC. 101) aims to stop that by creating a mandatory financial check for every program that receives federal aid. These programs must now meet two standards to be considered leading to “gainful employment”:
If a program fails these tests twice in three years, the school loses the ability to enroll new students in that program using federal aid funds. They have to wait three years before they can try again. This is a huge deal, as it forces institutions to prove their programs provide real financial value, not just a diploma.
Ever been stuck because your school wouldn’t release your transcript over a small outstanding balance? That practice is banned. SEC. 104 explicitly prohibits institutions from withholding official transcripts due to a debt owed by the student. If you ask for your transcript, the school must provide it. This provision removes a common administrative roadblock that prevents students from transferring credits or applying for jobs.
SEC. 104 also bans mandatory arbitration clauses in enrollment agreements. This means if a school lies or breaks its promises, you are no longer forced into private arbitration; you can actually sue them in court, alone or as part of a group. If you win, the school could face damages up to three times the amount of your loss if the court finds they acted knowingly or recklessly.
If you were misled by your school, getting your loan discharged (canceled) just got much easier (SEC. 102). The bill broadens the definition of a valid “borrower defense to repayment” to include substantial misrepresentation, broken contractual promises, aggressive recruitment tactics, or state law violations. The Secretary of Education must now discharge your debt if it’s more likely than not that the school committed one of these bad acts.
Even better, if your school closes down, the bill mandates automatic loan discharge one year after the closure for any student who didn't complete their program (SEC. 103). You won't have to fill out paperwork or apply; the government will wipe the slate clean, provided you didn't re-enroll at a similar school.
In a move that directly targets schools that spend heavily on marketing rather than education, the bill introduces a spending floor (SEC. 203). Starting in the 2026–2027 school year, institutions must spend at least 30 percent of their tuition and fee revenue directly on instruction costs. After 2031, the Secretary will set a permanent, higher minimum percentage that schools must spend on instruction and student services combined. This is a clear signal that federal aid is meant to fund education, not just recruitment campaigns.
To enforce this and other rules, the bill creates a new, dedicated Enforcement Unit within the Federal Student Aid office, complete with a Chief Enforcement Officer and the power to use “secret shoppers” and issue subpoenas to investigate misconduct (SEC. 301). It also increases the maximum civil penalty for violations from $25,000 to $100,000 per violation.