Prohibits new oil and gas leases in the Southern California Planning Area.
Mike Levin
Representative
CA-49
The Southern California Coast and Ocean Protection Act prohibits the Department of Interior from issuing any new leases for oil and gas exploration, development, or production in the Southern California Planning Area. This area is defined by the 2024-2029 National Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Program. The bill amends the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to implement this prohibition.
This proposed legislation, titled the "Southern California Coast and Ocean Protection Act," aims to put a stop to any new oil and gas activities in a designated zone off the Southern California coast. Specifically, it would amend the existing Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) – the main federal law governing offshore resources – to prohibit the government from issuing leases or permits for oil and gas exploration, development, or production within the Southern California Planning Area, as defined in a late 2023 federal program proposal.
So, what does this actually mean on the ground, or rather, in the water? If passed, the federal government, specifically the Secretary of the Interior who oversees offshore leasing via the OCSLA, would be legally barred from opening up this specific patch of the Pacific for future oil and gas projects. The bill targets the "Southern California Planning Area," a region formally outlined in the government's 2024-2029 offshore leasing plan. Think of it as putting a permanent "No Trespassing for Oil Rigs" sign up in this specific coastal zone.
The core idea here is environmental and coastal protection. By preventing new drilling infrastructure, the bill aims to shield Southern California's beaches, marine ecosystems, and coastal communities from the risks associated with offshore oil and gas operations, like potential spills or habitat disruption. This directly impacts anyone who lives, works, or recreates along that coastline – from surfers and beachgoers to fishing operations and tourism businesses that depend on a healthy ocean environment.
Naturally, this kind of prohibition affects different groups. Coastal residents, environmental advocates, and industries like tourism and fishing would likely see this as a win, preserving the natural resources they rely on. On the flip side, oil and gas companies looking for new areas to explore and develop, along with the service industries that support offshore drilling, would find this specific region closed off for future business opportunities. The bill essentially prioritizes environmental preservation over potential energy extraction in this defined area.