PolicyBrief
H.R. 2856
119th CongressApr 10th 2025
Great Lakes and National Weather Service Funding Protection Act
IN COMMITTEE

The "Great Lakes and National Weather Service Funding Protection Act" ensures that funds allocated to the National Weather Service and Great Lakes restoration projects cannot be deferred or transferred without explicit congressional approval.

Timothy Kennedy
D

Timothy Kennedy

Representative

NY-26

LEGISLATION

Bill Aims to Lock Down NOAA Funding for National Weather Service and Great Lakes Programs

This proposed legislation, the "Great Lakes and National Weather Service Funding Protection Act," puts specific guardrails around federal money allocated to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Specifically, it targets funds designated for the National Weather Service (NWS) and programs focused on the Great Lakes Region, including money from the recent Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act. The core idea is to prevent these specific funds from being deferred, transferred, or otherwise moved around for different purposes unless a brand-new law is passed that explicitly allows it and mentions this Act.

Ring-Fencing Critical Funds

Think of it like setting aside dedicated money in your budget – this bill essentially tries to put a lockbox around funds meant for weather forecasting and Great Lakes protection. Under Section 2, money appropriated for the NWS and Great Lakes initiatives can't be impounded (held back) or shifted elsewhere within NOAA or the government without explicit, new legislative approval. This aims to ensure that the resources Congress intends for these specific, critical functions – like providing the weather forecasts many people check daily or monitoring the health of the Great Lakes ecosystem – remain available for those purposes.

Annual Check-In Required

The bill doesn't just set the rule; it requires proof of compliance. The Administrator of NOAA must formally certify to key committees in both the House and Senate that these funding restrictions have been followed. This certification is required within 30 days of the Act becoming law and then must be submitted annually. It’s a mechanism designed to create ongoing accountability and transparency, ensuring Congress can track that the designated funds are being used as intended.

The Trade-Off: Stability vs. Flexibility

Protecting funding streams like this provides stability for essential services. Consistent resources mean the NWS can reliably operate weather monitoring systems, issue timely warnings for severe storms, and support industries from farming to aviation. Likewise, it supports ongoing efforts to manage and protect the vital Great Lakes. However, this kind of restriction reduces NOAA's internal flexibility. If an unexpected, urgent need arises in another part of the agency, shifting funds away from the NWS or Great Lakes programs would be significantly harder, potentially delaying responses or requiring complex legislative action even for internal budget adjustments.