PolicyBrief
H.R. 2849
119th CongressApr 10th 2025
West Coast Ocean Protection Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

This Act permanently prohibits new oil and gas exploration, development, and production on the Outer Continental Shelf off the coasts of California, Oregon, and Washington.

Jared Huffman
D

Jared Huffman

Representative

CA-2

LEGISLATION

West Coast Ocean Protection Act Permanently Bans All New Offshore Oil Drilling from California to Washington

The West Coast Ocean Protection Act of 2025 is about as straightforward as policy gets: it slams the door shut on new oil and gas activities off the coasts of California, Oregon, and Washington—permanently. This bill explicitly forbids the Secretary of the Interior from issuing any new leases or permits for exploration, development, or production of oil and natural gas in the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) in those three states.

Drawing a Line in the Sand (and Water)

Think of the OCS as the federally managed ocean area past state waters. This bill carves out a massive exclusion zone covering the entire West Coast, specifically targeting the planning areas identified in the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s 2024–2029 leasing program. This includes the Washington–Oregon, Northern California, Central California, and Southern California Planning Areas. The bill is clear: this prohibition overrides any existing law or rule that might suggest otherwise (SEC. 2).

For anyone who lives near the coast or relies on the ocean for work—from fishermen to tourism operators—this means a huge reduction in risk. A permanent ban means no more worrying about a major spill from a new drilling operation wiping out the local fishing grounds or ruining beaches for the next decade. It provides long-term certainty for coastal economies that depend on a healthy marine environment, which is a big deal when you’re trying to plan a business or a career around the ocean.

The Trade-Off: Certainty vs. Revenue

When a bill offers permanent protection, it inevitably means someone else loses a potential opportunity. In this case, the bill eliminates future revenue streams for the federal government that would have come from leasing fees and royalties paid by oil and gas companies. For those companies, it means they lose access to potential new reserves in these specific areas, forcing them to focus their domestic efforts elsewhere. While the bill’s clarity is a benefit—everyone knows where they stand—it does remove the possibility of future administrations tapping into these specific offshore resources, regardless of future energy needs.

However, the primary impact here is environmental protection and risk mitigation. By permanently removing the threat of new oil infrastructure, the Act aims to safeguard sensitive marine ecosystems and coastal communities from the direct and indirect effects of drilling, including seismic testing, routine discharges, and, most critically, catastrophic spills. It’s a policy move that prioritizes ocean health and coastal stability over potential energy extraction in this region.