PolicyBrief
H.R. 2838
119th CongressApr 10th 2025
Ending Intermittent Energy Subsidies Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

The "Ending Intermittent Energy Subsidies Act of 2025" phases out tax credits for wind and solar energy and ends the transferability of certain clean energy tax credits not related to wind or solar.

Julie Fedorchak
R

Julie Fedorchak

Representative

ND

LEGISLATION

Bill Proposes 4-Year Phase-Out for Key Wind and Solar Tax Credits, Ends Transferability for Others

Alright, let's unpack the "Ending Intermittent Energy Subsidies Act of 2025." In plain English, this bill aims to significantly cut back financial incentives for wind and solar energy projects. It sets up a four-year schedule to gradually eliminate two major tax credits: the Section 45Y production credit (rewarding electricity generated) and the Section 48E investment credit (helping cover upfront building costs) specifically for wind and solar facilities. Additionally, it immediately stops the ability for developers of other types of clean energy projects (those qualifying under parts of 45Y and 48E but not wind or solar) to sell or transfer their tax credits to other taxpayers, a process known as transferability.

Sunsetting Support: The Wind & Solar Phase-Out

The core of this bill lies in Sections 3 and 4, which put wind and solar tax credits on a firm downward path. Think of it like dimming the lights over four years.

  • Production Credit (Sec 3): For electricity generated by wind and solar projects after this bill potentially becomes law, the existing Section 45Y credit shrinks each year. In year one, projects get 80% of the credit, then 60% in year two, 40% in year three, 20% in year four, and finally, zero percent after that. This directly impacts the ongoing revenue calculations for existing and new wind/solar farms.
  • Investment Credit (Sec 4): For new wind and solar facilities, the Section 48E investment credit also decreases based on when the facility is "placed in service" (basically, when it starts operating). If it comes online in the first year after enactment, the credit is 80% of the original. This drops to 60% in year two, 40% in year three, 20% in year four, and zero thereafter. This makes building new projects progressively more expensive from a tax incentive standpoint.

For example, a company planning a large solar installation would see the tax benefit shrink considerably if construction delays push its start date into the later years of this phase-out.

Transfer Troubles: Beyond Wind and Solar

Section 2 tackles something slightly different: tax credit transferability under Section 6418. This mechanism allows developers who might not owe enough taxes to use the full credit themselves to sell it to another company that does. This bill proposes ending this transfer option for clean electricity credits unless they are specifically tied to wind or solar energy generation. So, if a geothermal plant or another non-wind/solar clean energy project qualified for these credits, its developers would lose this financing tool, potentially making those projects harder to fund.

The Bottom Line: Recalibrating Clean Energy Economics

This legislation fundamentally changes the financial landscape for major renewable energy sources. By phasing out key production and investment credits for wind and solar, the bill increases the cost and potentially slows the pace of their deployment. Removing transferability for other clean tech adds financing hurdles for those sectors. While the stated goal is ending specific subsidies, the practical effect is a significant reduction in federal support for wind and solar development, which could impact energy investment trends, project economics, and potentially complicate meeting broader clean energy goals.