PolicyBrief
H.R. 2838
119th CongressApr 10th 2025
Ending Intermittent Energy Subsidies Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

This Act terminates the transferability of certain non-renewable portions of clean electricity credits and phases out the production and investment tax credits for solar and wind energy over four years.

Julie Fedorchak
R

Julie Fedorchak

Representative

ND

LEGISLATION

New Bill Axes Wind and Solar Tax Credits, Phasing Out Incentives Over Four Years

The "Ending Intermittent Energy Subsidies Act of 2025" is a straight-up, four-year countdown to zero for two of the biggest federal tax breaks supporting wind and solar power. If you’re a developer, investor, or even just someone watching your utility bill, this bill makes a massive change to how clean energy projects are financed in the U.S. Specifically, it targets the Clean Electricity Production Credit (Section 45Y) and the Clean Electricity Investment Credit (Section 48E), scheduling a complete phase-out of both credits for wind and solar facilities over four calendar years following the bill's enactment. After the fourth year, the credit amount drops to zero.

The Four-Year Countdown: What the Phase-Out Looks Like

This isn't a slow fade; it’s a systematic reduction. For both the production credit (which pays you per kilowatt-hour generated) and the investment credit (which reduces the cost of building the facility), the bill dictates a sharp decline. If a wind farm or solar array is placed in service, or if power is produced, during the first year after the law passes, the project only gets 80% of the credit it would have otherwise received. That drops to 60% in Year 2, 40% in Year 3, and then completely vanishes in Year 4 and beyond (Sec. 3, Sec. 4). This means that any project currently in the planning stages, or even those just starting construction, will see their expected financial returns—the backbone of their economic feasibility—systematically cut down year after year.

Who Feels This Change?

Think about a utility company or an independent power producer banking on these credits to make their projects cheaper than building a natural gas plant. For them, this bill is a seismic shift. When you remove a significant portion of the expected revenue (the production credit) and increase the upfront cost (by removing the investment credit), many planned projects become financially unviable overnight. This doesn't just affect the developers; it affects the entire supply chain—the manufacturers of solar panels and turbines, the construction workers, and the financing firms. For consumers, the removal of these incentives could mean that new, cleaner energy sources are more expensive to build, potentially slowing the transition and keeping electricity prices higher than they might otherwise be.

The Fine Print on Transferability

Beyond the phase-out, the bill also tightens up on how these credits can be used, specifically targeting transferability. Currently, if a developer can’t use all the tax credits they earn, they can sell them to another company that can. This bill removes the ability to transfer the portion of the production and investment credits that isn't directly related to wind or solar (Sec. 2). While this sounds technical, it’s about flexibility. If a company is building a clean energy facility that uses a mix of technologies—say, solar plus a battery storage component—this restriction complicates how they can finance and monetize the non-solar/wind parts of the project, adding administrative headaches and reducing financial maneuverability in complex projects.

The Bottom Line

This legislation is a clear signal that federal support for new wind and solar projects is ending. For anyone invested in the renewable energy sector—from the massive utility-scale farms to the smaller community solar projects—this bill creates a massive hurdle. It doesn't just reduce subsidies; it schedules their elimination, forcing developers to find entirely new financing models immediately. The immediate real-world impact is uncertainty, which is kryptonite for large infrastructure investments. Projects that were viable yesterday may not be viable tomorrow, potentially leading to stalled development and a slowdown in the deployment of new clean energy capacity across the country.