PolicyBrief
H.R. 2828
119th CongressApr 10th 2025
VA DATA Access Transparency and Accountability Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

This bill restricts access to veterans' data by the DOGE Service and special government employees for commercial or unauthorized purposes, ensuring data security and privacy upon service termination.

Herbert Conaway
D

Herbert Conaway

Representative

NJ-3

LEGISLATION

VA Proposes New Data Walls: Bill Aims to Block DOGE Service Access and Tighten Rules on Veteran Info

This bill, the VA DATA Access Transparency and Accountability Act of 2025, steps in to tighten the reins on who can access sensitive veteran information held by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Specifically, Section 2 aims to completely block the United States DOGE Service from accessing any veteran data within VA systems. It also sets new rules for 'special Government employees' (SGEs) – think temporary advisors or consultants – preventing them from using VA data for commercial profit or other non-governmental purposes unless explicitly authorized by the VA Secretary. The core goal seems clear: enhance the security and privacy of veterans' personal details.

Locking the Digital Doors

The most direct change here is the firewall between the VA's data banks and the DOGE Service. The bill doesn't mince words, stating the VA Secretary cannot provide access. For SGEs working with the VA, the rules are twofold. First, they're barred from taking veteran data – defined broadly to include everything from health records and Social Security numbers to financial details and biometrics (Sec. 2) – for personal gain or unauthorized outside use. Imagine a consultant working on improving VA appointment scheduling; this rule means they couldn't leverage insights or data patterns learned on the job for their private company's benefit. Second, when their temporary government service ends, these SGEs must return all VA data and are prohibited from keeping any copies.

Potential Snags and Questions

While the goal of protecting veteran data is straightforward, a couple of points might raise eyebrows. The bill prohibits SGEs using data for "any non-governmental purpose authorized by the Secretary." This phrase (Sec. 2) introduces a potential gray area – what exactly constitutes an authorized purpose, and how will that authority be used or overseen? It could potentially allow data sharing if the Secretary deems it appropriate, slightly softening the otherwise strict prohibition. Additionally, while blocking the DOGE Service might enhance privacy, it's worth considering if this could inadvertently hinder legitimate, beneficial data sharing between agencies down the line, perhaps for fraud prevention or coordinated services, though the bill doesn't specify the DOGE Service's current or intended use. Finally, ensuring every bit of data is returned by departing SGEs presents a practical enforcement challenge common in data security.