The "Resilient Coasts and Estuaries Act of 2025" enhances coastal and estuarine resilience through restoration programs, expands the National Estuarine Research Reserve System, and promotes climate change impact monitoring.
Mike Levin
Representative
CA-49
The Resilient Coasts and Estuaries Act of 2025 reauthorizes and expands programs aimed at protecting and restoring coastal and estuarine areas. It prioritizes projects that enhance ecological function, mitigate climate change impacts, and benefit underserved communities. The act also directs the establishment of new National Estuarine Research Reserves and promotes research and monitoring of climate change impacts on these vital ecosystems. Finally, it increases funding authorizations for coastal and estuarine conservation efforts.
This legislation, the "Resilient Coasts and Estuaries Act of 2025," significantly updates parts of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972. It rebrands and refocuses a key program towards coastal and estuarine resilience and restoration, aiming to protect valuable coastal areas, restore degraded ones, and bolster defenses against climate change impacts. The bill also mandates an expansion of the National Estuarine Research Reserve (NERR) system and increases authorized funding for these reserves through fiscal year 2029.
The bill overhauls the existing coastal protection program (formerly Sec 307A, now the "Coastal and Estuarine Resilience and Restoration Program"). Instead of just consulting, the managing federal agency must coordinate with states, local governments, NERRs, and even non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to identify priority areas. What gets priority? Think coastal spots with high ecological or community value, especially those threatened by development or climate change, or areas ripe for restoration. There's a specific focus on helping communities with "inadequate resources" prepare for coastal hazards or access the coast, including low-income areas. Land acquired or restored under this program needs to consider the value of "ecosystem services" – basically, the natural benefits land provides, like buffering storm surges or storing carbon. Interestingly, qualified NGOs can now receive grants to acquire and hold land, provided they have state support, ensure public access (unless restricted for ecological reasons), and have a backup plan if the NGO folds. The share of land acquisition funds benefiting NERRs also gets a bump from 15% to 20%.
Big news for estuaries: Section 3 directs the government to kickstart the process for designating at least five new National Estuarine Research Reserves within five years, aiming to get them officially designated within eight years (by roughly 2033 if the bill passes in 2025). Priority goes to states currently without a reserve and ensuring diverse types of estuaries are represented across the country. Existing NERRs get expanded marching orders and potential resources. The bill specifically adds tracking climate change impacts (like sea-level rise) to their duties and broadens the scope of financial assistance to cover maintenance, research, monitoring, stewardship, and training. The authorized funding for NERR grants gets a significant boost to $47 million annually for fiscal years 2025 through 2029. Importantly for locals, the bill clarifies that existing activities like fishing and hunting can continue within reserves unless a specific management plan says otherwise.
So, what's the real-world impact? If you live near the coast, especially in an area facing erosion or increased flooding, this could mean more federal support for projects like restoring wetlands that buffer storms or acquiring land to prevent risky development. The emphasis on communities with "inadequate resources" could channel funds to places previously left behind, though how "inadequate resources" is defined will be key. The expansion of the NERR system means more areas dedicated to studying and protecting estuaries, potentially leading to better local environmental management and educational opportunities. For those who fish or hunt in areas that might become NERRs, the bill offers some reassurance that these activities can likely continue. However, the allowance for NGOs to hold conservation land introduces a new dynamic, relying on these groups to manage properties effectively and ensure public benefit long-term. Potential friction points could arise in deciding which communities get prioritized for funding or balancing conservation goals with existing uses within the expanded NERR system.