PolicyBrief
H.R. 2761
119th CongressApr 9th 2025
Halting All Parades for Presidents’ Yearly Birthdays, It Risks Taxpayer Harm, Damages, And Your Budget Act
IN COMMITTEE

Prohibits federal funds from being used for military parades in Washington D.C. that celebrate an individual's birthday or personal milestone.

Steve Cohen
D

Steve Cohen

Representative

TN-9

LEGISLATION

New Bill Aims to Block Federal Funds for Presidential Birthday Military Parades in DC, Citing Taxpayer Costs

This proposed legislation, dubbed the "HAPPY BIRTHDAY Budget Act," puts a stop sign on using federal money for any military parade in Washington D.C. that's mainly about celebrating the birthday or personal milestone of an individual, specifically naming President Donald J. Trump. The core idea is straightforward: taxpayer dollars shouldn't foot the bill for parades centered around one person's big day.

What's Off the Table?

The bill gets specific in Section 4, prohibiting federal funds from covering any aspect of such a parade – think planning, execution, security details, transporting troops or equipment, or setting up infrastructure. It explicitly calls out preventing funding for a parade celebrating President Trump's birthday or other personal interests. This isn't just about the tanks and planes; it covers the whole logistical and security operation that comes with a large-scale event in the capital.

Why Draw This Line?

The lawmakers behind this bill lay out their reasoning in the findings (Section 2). They point to a previously considered military parade under President Trump that was estimated to cost $92 million for the military alone, plus over $21 million for D.C. public safety – costs that ultimately led to its cancellation. There's also concern about potential damage to D.C. roads from heavy military vehicles, leaving local taxpayers potentially on the hook for repairs. Furthermore, the bill notes that the District of Columbia often doesn't get fully reimbursed for costs incurred during federal events. The overall message, echoed in the Sense of Congress (Section 3), is that public funds are meant for the public good and national security, not personal celebrations, especially when alternative, less costly options exist.

So, No Extravagant Party?

While blocking funds for a military-style birthday bash, the bill (Section 5) cheekily suggests the President might consider alternatives like "cake, golf, or bingo night" that don't require armored vehicles. It even extends a "sincere, free of charge, Happy Birthday" and encourages well-wishers to use the U.S. Postal Service. This section underscores the bill's main point: celebrating is fine, but using significant federal resources for a personal military parade isn't appropriate, especially considering the potential costs and burden on the host city.