PolicyBrief
H.R. 2750
119th CongressApr 8th 2025
Bridging the Broadband Gap Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

This bill allows states to use federal broadband funds to provide vouchers to low-income households in areas lacking adequate internet service, helping them afford broadband access for up to a year.

David Taylor
R

David Taylor

Representative

OH-2

LEGISLATION

New Bill Allows BEAD Funds for 12-Month Satellite/Wireless Internet Vouchers in Underserved Areas

This proposed legislation, the "Bridging the Broadband Gap Act of 2025," tweaks how states can use money from the big federal broadband fund known as the BEAD Program (part of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act). The core change? It allows states to offer vouchers to help households pay for internet service, specifically targeting areas that currently lack adequate broadband access.

Dialing Up the Details: How the Vouchers Would Work

If this passes, states could choose to use their BEAD grant money to create a voucher program. These vouchers wouldn't be for everyone; they're aimed at households in places officially designated as "unserved" or "underserved" – basically, spots where getting decent internet is tough. There’s a priority lane for households in political subdivisions (like counties or towns) where the average income is below the state median.

The vouchers are designed specifically for satellite or fixed wireless internet services – options often used where laying cable or fiber isn't practical. They would last for up to 12 consecutive months and cover 50 percent of the cost for buying or leasing necessary equipment (like a satellite dish or receiver) plus the monthly service fees.

Who Gets Connected (and for How Long?)

This could be a welcome boost for folks struggling with connectivity, especially in rural or remote areas. Imagine a family needing reliable internet for remote work or online classes but finding the upfront equipment costs or monthly bills for satellite service too high. This voucher could cut those costs in half for a year.

However, the 12-month limit is a key factor. It offers temporary relief, but doesn't solve the long-term affordability puzzle once the year is up. Also, households still need to cover the other 50% of the costs, which might remain a barrier for some. Crucially, who qualifies depends on how each state defines "adequate broadband service" and identifies "underserved locations," meaning availability could vary significantly from place to place.

Temporary Fix or Long-Term Link?

This bill essentially offers states a flexible way to use infrastructure funds for immediate relief in hard-to-reach areas, using existing satellite and fixed wireless technology. It's less about building new fiber lines everywhere (the main goal of BEAD) and more about getting some form of reliable connection to people now using available tech.

While it provides a targeted subsidy, the reliance on state definitions for eligibility and the focus on specific technologies (satellite/fixed wireless) are points to watch. It represents a shift towards subsidizing service costs directly, albeit temporarily, rather than solely focusing on funding infrastructure build-out in those specific voucher areas.