The "Fix Moldy Housing Act" aims to establish national standards and provide financial assistance to state, tribal, and local governments for mold assessment and remediation in public and private buildings.
Haley Stevens
Representative
MI-11
The "Fix Moldy Housing Act" directs the EPA to study and set nonbinding national standards for mold assessment and remediation. It establishes a grant program to assist State and Tribal governments with mold issues, including licensing programs and technical assistance. Additionally, it provides grants for mold remediation in public buildings, severely impacted homes, and temporary housing for eligible individuals, prioritizing low-income households and high-risk areas.
This bill, the "Fix Moldy Housing Act," directs the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to tackle indoor mold problems head-on. It kicks things off by ordering a study, to be completed within a year, figuring out exactly when mold needs professional assessment and cleanup, and the safest ways to do it (Section 2). Based on that study, the EPA then has two years to issue national standards—think guidelines, not strict laws initially—for identifying problematic mold levels and handling remediation safely (Section 3).
Before diving into fixes, the bill wants a solid scientific footing. Section 2 mandates a deep dive with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to understand the when and how of mold remediation. What level of mold triggers action? What are the best practices to get rid of it without making things worse? These findings are crucial because they'll directly inform the national standards the EPA develops under Section 3. The goal seems to be creating a more consistent, science-backed playbook for dealing with mold across the country, defining "mold" simply as fungal growth on damp organic matter (Section 6).
Once the standards are drafted, the bill sets up two major avenues for action, backed by significant funding authorized from fiscal years 2026 through 2030.
First, Section 4 authorizes $50 million per year for the EPA to help State and Tribal governments get their own mold programs running. This includes grants to establish licensing programs for mold assessors and remediators – ensuring professionals doing the work are qualified. It also covers technical assistance and training from the EPA. Priority for these funds goes to areas known to be prone to mold, whether due to climate (think high humidity) or other factors.
Second, Section 5 authorizes another $50 million per year specifically for assessment and remediation grants given to State and Tribal governments. This money can be used to fix mold problems in government buildings (like public housing or schools) and in private homes. A key feature here is help for residents: grant funds can cover up to six months of temporary housing and moving costs for people severely impacted by mold who lack insurance or the money to move themselves. However, there are strings attached: States and Tribes must have that licensing program (from Section 4) in place to get these remediation grants. Also, funds can't be used for high-income households, and priority goes to helping low-income households and communities, particularly those in mold-susceptible areas. The federal government will cover up to 60% of the project costs, with states/tribes or other sources covering the rest.
So, what's the bottom line? If this passes, we could see a more standardized approach to tackling mold nationwide within a few years. For renters, homeowners (especially lower-income ones), or parents with kids in public schools located in mold-prone areas, this could eventually mean access to funding and qualified professionals to fix potentially serious health hazards. The requirement for state/tribal licensing programs (Sections 4 & 5) aims to ensure that the people doing the assessment and cleanup know what they're doing. However, setting up those licensing programs is a prerequisite for remediation grants, which might create a time lag. Also, remember the initial standards are nonbinding (Section 3), meaning their effectiveness will depend on adoption and enforcement at state and local levels. The bill clearly prioritizes helping those with fewer resources, specifically excluding high-income households from direct remediation aid (Section 5) and capping the federal contribution at 60%, requiring local buy-in.