PolicyBrief
H.R. 2722
119th CongressApr 8th 2025
VA Funding and Workforce Protection Act
IN COMMITTEE

This Act prevents the executive branch from deferring or transferring congressionally appropriated VA funds and establishes specific protections for VA personnel against hiring freezes and certain removals.

Timothy Kennedy
D

Timothy Kennedy

Representative

NY-26

LEGISLATION

VA Funding Bill Locks Down Budget, Blocks Hiring Freezes for Four Years, and Protects Staff

When Congress budgets money for veterans’ healthcare and benefits, the idea is that the money gets spent on veterans. The VA Funding and Workforce Protection Act is essentially a legislative lockbox designed to make sure that happens. This bill cuts off the ability of the Executive Branch—meaning the President or agency heads—to freeze, transfer, or reprogram discretionary funds set aside for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) without explicit, brand-new approval from Congress (Sec. 2).

Think of it this way: Normally, if the White House wants to hold back spending or shift money around, they have some authority to do so, especially in large agencies. This bill specifically exempts the VA’s budget from that maneuver. If the VA Secretary sees a funding shortfall coming within 30 days, they must immediately notify the Veterans’ Affairs Committees in the House and Senate. For veterans depending on consistent service delivery, this provision aims to remove a major source of uncertainty by ensuring the funds allocated for their care and benefits are actually available when needed.

Keeping the Doors Open: The Hiring Freeze Exemption

One of the most immediate impacts of this bill is on staffing. It grants the VA a blanket exemption from any federal hiring freeze issued by the President, the VA Secretary, or the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) (Sec. 3). This exemption is set to run for a four-year period, from January 20, 2025, through January 20, 2029. Why does this matter? If you’ve ever waited months for an appointment at a VA facility, you know that staffing shortages hurt service. By blocking hiring freezes, the bill attempts to ensure the VA can maintain and grow its workforce to meet demand, regardless of broader federal budget tightening.

The Fine Print on Firing and Rehiring

This legislation also contains some very specific protections for VA employees. First, it mandates the reinstatement of any veteran who was a career employee and was fired between January 20, 2025, and the date the bill becomes law (Sec. 3). Not only must they get their old job back, but they are also protected from any reduction-in-force (RIF) layoff until January 20, 2029. This is a targeted measure aimed at reversing specific personnel actions that may have occurred recently.

Second, the bill creates significant hurdles for the VA when it comes to layoffs and firing probationary employees. Before any reduction in force or reorganization leading to layoffs, the VA Secretary must give Congress 15 days’ written notice. Even more restrictive is the rule on probationary employees: the VA cannot remove an employee in probationary status unless Congress passes a new law specifically referencing this section and allowing the removal (Sec. 3). While the bill requires the VA to report to Congress immediately if a probationary employee is fired for poor performance, the overall effect is to make firing non-performing staff extremely difficult, which could create administrative headaches and potentially shield less effective employees.

Who’s Holding the Keys?

Ultimately, this bill is a major power shift, increasing Congress’s oversight at the expense of the Executive Branch’s budgetary flexibility. The VA Secretary is required to send a formal certification to Congress every year, starting 30 days after enactment, confirming that the department is complying with all these new rules (Sec. 4). For the average person, this means that the political levers controlling VA funding and staffing are being pulled closer to Capitol Hill. While this promises more stable funding for veterans’ services, it also creates an extremely rigid management structure, particularly around the workforce, which could slow down necessary administrative changes or the removal of underperforming staff.