The "Communities of Recovery Reauthorization Act of 2025" reauthorizes and increases funding for communities of recovery support services from 2026-2030.
Brittany Pettersen
Representative
CO-7
The "Communities of Recovery Reauthorization Act of 2025" reauthorizes and increases funding for communities of recovery support services. It amends the Public Health Service Act to raise the allocated funding from $5,000,000 per year to $17,000,000 per year for fiscal years 2026 through 2030.
This bill, the "Communities of Recovery Reauthorization Act of 2025," aims to significantly ramp up support for local substance abuse recovery efforts. It amends the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize an existing grant program and more than triples its annual funding – jumping from $5 million to $17 million for each fiscal year from 2026 through 2030. The core idea is to put more resources into community-level organizations that help people navigate the path to recovery.
So, what does that extra $12 million a year actually mean on the ground? This funding boost, detailed in Section 2 of the act which amends Section 547(f) of the Public Health Service Act, goes directly to the "Building communities of recovery" program. Think of the local centers and peer support groups that offer counseling, job assistance, or just a safe space for people fighting addiction. More funding could translate into expanded hours, hiring more peer counselors, launching new outreach programs in underserved areas, or providing stronger links to housing and employment services – practical help that makes a real difference for individuals and families.
While the increased funding is a clear positive signal for strengthening recovery infrastructure, the bill itself focuses purely on the dollar amount and the reauthorization timeline (Fiscal Years 2026-2030). It doesn't explicitly detail new mechanisms for tracking exactly how effectively this larger pot of money gets used by recipient organizations. Ensuring these significantly increased funds lead to proportionally better outcomes will likely rely on existing grant oversight processes within the Public Health Service.