The Dignity in Housing Act of 2025 mandates that the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development inspect public housing projects with 100 or more units at least once every two years.
Nicole Malliotakis
Representative
NY-11
The Dignity in Housing Act of 2025 mandates that the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development inspect public housing projects with 100 or more units at least once every two years. These inspections will ensure the properties meet maintenance requirements and must be conducted by HUD employees or chosen inspectors, excluding public housing agency staff. The results of these inspections will be published online to promote transparency.
The Dignity in Housing Act of 2025 introduces a new layer of oversight for larger public housing projects. Specifically, Section 2 mandates that the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) inspect projects with 100 or more units at least once every two years. The goal is to verify these properties meet federal maintenance standards, as outlined in existing law (42 U.S.C. 1437d(f)(1)).
So, how does this work on the ground? It means regular check-ins, specifically biennial inspections, focused solely on the physical condition and upkeep of these larger housing developments. A key detail here is who does the inspecting: the bill requires inspections be conducted by HUD employees or other inspectors chosen by the Secretary, explicitly excluding staff or agents tied to the local public housing agency managing the property. This aims to ensure an impartial assessment of whether maintenance requirements are actually being met.
Beyond just doing the inspections, the Act requires the results to be published online. This transparency measure means residents, advocates, and the general public could potentially access reports on the condition of these housing units. Think of it as a public report card for building maintenance. It’s also important to note these federally mandated inspections are in addition to any existing inspection requirements (under paragraph 3 of the same section), suggesting an increased level of scrutiny intended to hold housing providers accountable and ultimately improve living conditions for residents.